1980 Peterson 34 vs 1985 Sabre 32 — Comparison

1980 Peterson 34
VS
1985 Sabre 321985 Sabre 32

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1980 Peterson 341985 Sabre 32
General
ManufacturerPetersonSabre
Year1980–19861985–1991
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerDoug PetersonRoger Hewson
Dimensions
LOA10.36 m (34.0 ft)9.75 m (32.0 ft)
LWL8.53 m (28.0 ft)8.08 m (26.5 ft)
Beam3.28 m (10.8 ft)3.10 m (10.2 ft)
Draft1.83 m (6.0 ft)1.45 m (4.8 ft)
Weight
Displacement5,216 kg (11,499 lbs)4,082 kg (8,999 lbs)
Ballast2,268 kg (5,000 lbs)1,633 kg (3,600 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area51.1 m² (550 ft²)42.0 m² (452 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine18 HP18 HP
Fuel Capacity76 L (20.1 gal)57 L (15.1 gal)
Water Capacity114 L (30.1 gal)114 L (30.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths65
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1980 Peterson 34
17.26
1985 Sabre 32
16.71
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1980 Peterson 34
43.48
1985 Sabre 32
40.00
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1980 Peterson 34
0.76
1985 Sabre 32
0.78
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1980 Peterson 34
19.98
1985 Sabre 32
18.88

Detailed Comparison

The 1980 Peterson 34 and 1985 Sabre 32 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1980 Peterson 34 is a 1980s design by Peterson from USA, while the 1985 Sabre 32 is a 1980s offering from Sabre from USA. The 1980 Peterson 34 was penned by Doug Peterson. The 1985 Sabre 32 was designed by Roger Hewson.

In terms of size, the 1980 Peterson 34 measures 10.36m (34.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.28m, compared to the 1985 Sabre 32 at 9.75m (32.0ft) with a 3.10m beam. The 1980 Peterson 34 is 0.61m longer than the 1985 Sabre 32. The 1980 Peterson 34 displaces approximately 28% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1980 Peterson 34 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.26 and 51.1 m² of sail area. The 1985 Sabre 32, with an SA/D of 16.71 and 42.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1980 Peterson 34 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1980 Peterson 34 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 20.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.76). The 1985 Sabre 32 has a comfort ratio of 18.9 and a capsize screening value of 0.78. The ballast ratios are 43.5% for the 1980 Peterson 34 and 40.0% for the 1985 Sabre 32, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1980 Peterson 34 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L of water capacity and 76L of fuel. The 1985 Sabre 32 offers 5 berths in 2 cabins with 114L water and 57L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1980 Peterson 34 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1980 Peterson 34 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1980 Peterson 34 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1980 Peterson 34 · 1985 Sabre 32