1980 Peterson 34 vs Hanse 375 — Comparison

1980 Peterson 34 1980 Peterson 34
VS
Hanse 375 Hanse 375

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1980 Peterson 34 Hanse 375
General
Manufacturer Peterson Hanse
Year 1980–1986 2009–2015
Type Sloop Sloop
Country USA Germany
Designer Doug Peterson judel/vrolijk & co
Dimensions
LOA 10.36 m (34.0 ft) 11.35 m (37.2 ft)
LWL 8.53 m (28.0 ft) 10.05 m (33.0 ft)
Beam 3.28 m (10.8 ft) 3.65 m (12.0 ft)
Draft 1.83 m (6.0 ft) 1.90 m (6.2 ft)
Weight
Displacement 5,216 kg (11,499 lbs) 7,000 kg (15,432 lbs)
Ballast 2,268 kg (5,000 lbs) 2,150 kg (4,740 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 51.1 m² (550 ft²) 62.0 m² (667 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 18 HP 29 HP
Fuel Capacity 76 L (20.1 gal) 130 L (34.3 gal)
Water Capacity 114 L (30.1 gal) 250 L (66.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 6 6
Cabins 2 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1980 Peterson 34
17.26
Hanse 375
17.21
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1980 Peterson 34
43.48
Hanse 375
30.71
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1980 Peterson 34
0.76
Hanse 375
0.76
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1980 Peterson 34
19.98
Hanse 375
17.59

Detailed Comparison

The 1980 Peterson 34 and Hanse 375 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1980 Peterson 34 is a 1980s design by Peterson from USA, while the Hanse 375 is a 2000s offering from Hanse from Germany. The 1980 Peterson 34 was penned by Doug Peterson. The Hanse 375 was designed by judel/vrolijk & co.

In terms of size, the 1980 Peterson 34 measures 10.36m (34.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.28m, compared to the Hanse 375 at 11.35m (37.2ft) with a 3.65m beam. The Hanse 375 is 0.99m longer than the 1980 Peterson 34. The Hanse 375 displaces approximately 34% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1980 Peterson 34 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.26 and 51.1 m² of sail area. The Hanse 375, with an SA/D of 17.21 and 62.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 1980 Peterson 34 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1980 Peterson 34 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 20.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.76). The Hanse 375 has a comfort ratio of 17.6 and a capsize screening value of 0.76. The ballast ratios are 43.5% for the 1980 Peterson 34 and 30.7% for the Hanse 375, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1980 Peterson 34 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L of water capacity and 76L of fuel. The Hanse 375 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 250L water and 130L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1980 Peterson 34 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1980 Peterson 34 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS