1980 Peterson 34 vs Hanse 415 — Comparison

1980 Peterson 34
VS
Hanse 415

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1980 Peterson 34Hanse 415
General
ManufacturerPetersonHanse
Year1980–19862011–2017
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAGermany
DesignerDoug Petersonjudel/vrolijk & co
Dimensions
LOA10.36 m (34.0 ft)12.40 m (40.7 ft)
LWL8.53 m (28.0 ft)10.90 m (35.8 ft)
Beam3.28 m (10.8 ft)3.96 m (13.0 ft)
Draft1.83 m (6.0 ft)2.10 m (6.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement5,216 kg (11,499 lbs)8,500 kg (18,739 lbs)
Ballast2,268 kg (5,000 lbs)2,650 kg (5,842 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area51.1 m² (550 ft²)73.0 m² (786 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine18 HP40 HP
Fuel Capacity76 L (20.1 gal)170 L (44.9 gal)
Water Capacity114 L (30.1 gal)310 L (81.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths68
Cabins23

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1980 Peterson 34
17.26
Hanse 415
17.81
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1980 Peterson 34
43.48
Hanse 415
31.18
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1980 Peterson 34
0.76
Hanse 415
0.78
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1980 Peterson 34
19.98
Hanse 415
16.21

Detailed Comparison

The 1980 Peterson 34 and Hanse 415 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1980 Peterson 34 is a 1980s design by Peterson from USA, while the Hanse 415 is a modern offering from Hanse from Germany. The 1980 Peterson 34 was penned by Doug Peterson. The Hanse 415 was designed by judel/vrolijk & co.

In terms of size, the 1980 Peterson 34 measures 10.36m (34.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.28m, compared to the Hanse 415 at 12.40m (40.7ft) with a 3.96m beam. The Hanse 415 is 2.04m longer than the 1980 Peterson 34. The Hanse 415 displaces approximately 63% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1980 Peterson 34 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.26 and 51.1 m² of sail area. The Hanse 415, with an SA/D of 17.81 and 73.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The Hanse 415 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1980 Peterson 34 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 20.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.76). The Hanse 415 has a comfort ratio of 16.2 and a capsize screening value of 0.78. The ballast ratios are 43.5% for the 1980 Peterson 34 and 31.2% for the Hanse 415, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1980 Peterson 34 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L of water capacity and 76L of fuel. The Hanse 415 offers 8 berths in 3 cabins with 310L water and 170L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1980 Peterson 34 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hanse 415 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The Hanse 415 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1980 Peterson 34 · Hanse 415