1981 Pearson 36 vs 2003 Hallberg-Rassy 43 Mk II — Comparison

1981 Pearson 361981 Pearson 36
VS
2003 Hallberg-Rassy 43 Mk II

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1981 Pearson 362003 Hallberg-Rassy 43 Mk II
General
ManufacturerPearsonHallberg-Rassy
Year1981–19852003–2014
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSASweden
DesignerWilliam ShawGerman Frers
Dimensions
LOA10.67 m (35.0 ft)13.15 m (43.1 ft)
LWL8.84 m (29.0 ft)11.00 m (36.1 ft)
Beam3.51 m (11.5 ft)4.05 m (13.3 ft)
Draft1.52 m (5.0 ft)2.05 m (6.7 ft)
Weight
Displacement6,124 kg (13,501 lbs)11,500 kg (25,353 lbs)
Ballast2,495 kg (5,501 lbs)4,500 kg (9,921 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area51.6 m² (555 ft²)84.0 m² (904 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine22 HP75 HP
Fuel Capacity76 L (20.1 gal)250 L (66.0 gal)
Water Capacity114 L (30.1 gal)500 L (132.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths77
Cabins23

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1981 Pearson 36
15.66
2003 Hallberg-Rassy 43 Mk II
16.75
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1981 Pearson 36
40.74
2003 Hallberg-Rassy 43 Mk II
39.13
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1981 Pearson 36
0.77
2003 Hallberg-Rassy 43 Mk II
0.72
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1981 Pearson 36
20.04
2003 Hallberg-Rassy 43 Mk II
20.22

Detailed Comparison

The 1981 Pearson 36 and 2003 Hallberg-Rassy 43 Mk II represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1981 Pearson 36 is a 1980s design by Pearson from USA, while the 2003 Hallberg-Rassy 43 Mk II is a 2000s offering from Hallberg-Rassy from Sweden. The 1981 Pearson 36 was penned by William Shaw. The 2003 Hallberg-Rassy 43 Mk II was designed by German Frers.

In terms of size, the 1981 Pearson 36 measures 10.67m (35.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.51m, compared to the 2003 Hallberg-Rassy 43 Mk II at 13.15m (43.1ft) with a 4.05m beam. The 2003 Hallberg-Rassy 43 Mk II is 2.48m longer than the 1981 Pearson 36. The 2003 Hallberg-Rassy 43 Mk II displaces approximately 88% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1981 Pearson 36 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.66 and 51.6 m² of sail area. The 2003 Hallberg-Rassy 43 Mk II, with an SA/D of 16.75 and 84.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 2003 Hallberg-Rassy 43 Mk II has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1981 Pearson 36 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 20.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.77). The 2003 Hallberg-Rassy 43 Mk II has a comfort ratio of 20.2 and a capsize screening value of 0.72. The ballast ratios are 40.7% for the 1981 Pearson 36 and 39.1% for the 2003 Hallberg-Rassy 43 Mk II, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1981 Pearson 36 provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 114L of water capacity and 76L of fuel. The 2003 Hallberg-Rassy 43 Mk II offers 7 berths in 3 cabins with 500L water and 250L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 2003 Hallberg-Rassy 43 Mk II is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2003 Hallberg-Rassy 43 Mk II has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1981 Pearson 36 · 2003 Hallberg-Rassy 43 Mk II