1981 Pearson 36 vs 2005 Dehler 34 — Comparison

1981 Pearson 361981 Pearson 36
VS
2005 Dehler 342005 Dehler 34

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1981 Pearson 362005 Dehler 34
General
ManufacturerPearsonDehler
Year1981–19852005–2012
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAGermany
DesignerWilliam ShawJudel/Vrolijk
Dimensions
LOA10.67 m (35.0 ft)10.30 m (33.8 ft)
LWL8.84 m (29.0 ft)9.10 m (29.9 ft)
Beam3.51 m (11.5 ft)3.25 m (10.7 ft)
Draft1.52 m (5.0 ft)1.80 m (5.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement6,124 kg (13,501 lbs)4,800 kg (10,582 lbs)
Ballast2,495 kg (5,501 lbs)1,700 kg (3,748 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area51.6 m² (555 ft²)50.0 m² (538 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine22 HP18 HP
Fuel Capacity76 L (20.1 gal)50 L (13.2 gal)
Water Capacity114 L (30.1 gal)100 L (26.4 gal)
Accommodation
Berths76
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1981 Pearson 36
15.66
2005 Dehler 34
17.85
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1981 Pearson 36
40.74
2005 Dehler 34
35.42
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1981 Pearson 36
0.77
2005 Dehler 34
0.77
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1981 Pearson 36
20.04
2005 Dehler 34
17.15

Detailed Comparison

The 1981 Pearson 36 and 2005 Dehler 34 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1981 Pearson 36 is a 1980s design by Pearson from USA, while the 2005 Dehler 34 is a 2000s offering from Dehler from Germany. The 1981 Pearson 36 was penned by William Shaw. The 2005 Dehler 34 was designed by Judel/Vrolijk.

In terms of size, the 1981 Pearson 36 measures 10.67m (35.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.51m, compared to the 2005 Dehler 34 at 10.30m (33.8ft) with a 3.25m beam. The 1981 Pearson 36 is 0.37m longer than the 2005 Dehler 34. The 1981 Pearson 36 displaces approximately 28% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1981 Pearson 36 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.66 and 51.6 m² of sail area. The 2005 Dehler 34, with an SA/D of 17.85 and 50.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 2005 Dehler 34 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1981 Pearson 36 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 20.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.77). The 2005 Dehler 34 has a comfort ratio of 17.2 and a capsize screening value of 0.77. The ballast ratios are 40.7% for the 1981 Pearson 36 and 35.4% for the 2005 Dehler 34, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1981 Pearson 36 provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 114L of water capacity and 76L of fuel. The 2005 Dehler 34 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 100L water and 50L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1981 Pearson 36 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2005 Dehler 34 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1981 Pearson 36 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1981 Pearson 36 · 2005 Dehler 34