1981 Pearson 36 vs Hanse 445 — Comparison
1981 Pearson 36
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | 1981 Pearson 36 | Hanse 445 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | Pearson | Hanse |
| Year | 1981–1985 | 2012–2017 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | USA | Germany |
| Designer | William Shaw | judel/vrolijk & co |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 10.67 m (35.0 ft) | 13.50 m (44.3 ft) |
| LWL | 8.84 m (29.0 ft) | 11.80 m (38.7 ft) |
| Beam | 3.51 m (11.5 ft) | 4.20 m (13.8 ft) |
| Draft | 1.52 m (5.0 ft) | 2.10 m (6.9 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 6,124 kg (13,501 lbs) | 10,100 kg (22,267 lbs) |
| Ballast | 2,495 kg (5,501 lbs) | 3,200 kg (7,055 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 51.6 m² (555 ft²) | 87.0 m² (937 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Fin | Fin |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 22 HP | 55 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 76 L (20.1 gal) | 200 L (52.8 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 114 L (30.1 gal) | 370 L (97.7 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 7 | 8 |
| Cabins | 2 | 3 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The 1981 Pearson 36 and Hanse 445 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1981 Pearson 36 is a 1980s design by Pearson from USA, while the Hanse 445 is a modern offering from Hanse from Germany. The 1981 Pearson 36 was penned by William Shaw. The Hanse 445 was designed by judel/vrolijk & co.
In terms of size, the 1981 Pearson 36 measures 10.67m (35.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.51m, compared to the Hanse 445 at 13.50m (44.3ft) with a 4.20m beam. The Hanse 445 is 2.83m longer than the 1981 Pearson 36. The Hanse 445 displaces approximately 65% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the 1981 Pearson 36 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.66 and 51.6 m² of sail area. The Hanse 445, with an SA/D of 18.91 and 87.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The Hanse 445 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the 1981 Pearson 36 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 20.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.77). The Hanse 445 has a comfort ratio of 15.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.78. The ballast ratios are 40.7% for the 1981 Pearson 36 and 31.7% for the Hanse 445, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the 1981 Pearson 36 provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 114L of water capacity and 76L of fuel. The Hanse 445 offers 8 berths in 3 cabins with 370L water and 200L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The 1981 Pearson 36 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The Hanse 445 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: The Hanse 445 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.
Compare Different Boats
Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats
Or view individual specs: 1981 Pearson 36 · Hanse 445