1981 Pearson 36 vs 2012 X-Yachts Xp 44 — Comparison

1981 Pearson 361981 Pearson 36
VS
2012 X-Yachts Xp 44

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1981 Pearson 362012 X-Yachts Xp 44
General
ManufacturerPearsonX-Yachts
Year1981–19852012–2020
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSADenmark
DesignerWilliam ShawNiels Jeppesen
Dimensions
LOA10.67 m (35.0 ft)13.29 m (43.6 ft)
LWL8.84 m (29.0 ft)11.70 m (38.4 ft)
Beam3.51 m (11.5 ft)4.02 m (13.2 ft)
Draft1.52 m (5.0 ft)2.45 m (8.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement6,124 kg (13,501 lbs)9,800 kg (21,605 lbs)
Ballast2,495 kg (5,501 lbs)3,700 kg (8,157 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area51.6 m² (555 ft²)90.0 m² (969 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine22 HP55 HP
Fuel Capacity76 L (20.1 gal)140 L (37.0 gal)
Water Capacity114 L (30.1 gal)270 L (71.3 gal)
Accommodation
Berths77
Cabins23

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1981 Pearson 36
15.66
2012 X-Yachts Xp 44
19.96
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1981 Pearson 36
40.74
2012 X-Yachts Xp 44
37.76
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1981 Pearson 36
0.77
2012 X-Yachts Xp 44
0.75
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1981 Pearson 36
20.04
2012 X-Yachts Xp 44
15.91

Detailed Comparison

The 1981 Pearson 36 and 2012 X-Yachts Xp 44 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1981 Pearson 36 is a 1980s design by Pearson from USA, while the 2012 X-Yachts Xp 44 is a modern offering from X-Yachts from Denmark. The 1981 Pearson 36 was penned by William Shaw. The 2012 X-Yachts Xp 44 was designed by Niels Jeppesen.

In terms of size, the 1981 Pearson 36 measures 10.67m (35.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.51m, compared to the 2012 X-Yachts Xp 44 at 13.29m (43.6ft) with a 4.02m beam. The 2012 X-Yachts Xp 44 is 2.62m longer than the 1981 Pearson 36. The 2012 X-Yachts Xp 44 displaces approximately 60% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1981 Pearson 36 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.66 and 51.6 m² of sail area. The 2012 X-Yachts Xp 44, with an SA/D of 19.96 and 90.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 2012 X-Yachts Xp 44 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1981 Pearson 36 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 20.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.77). The 2012 X-Yachts Xp 44 has a comfort ratio of 15.9 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 40.7% for the 1981 Pearson 36 and 37.8% for the 2012 X-Yachts Xp 44, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1981 Pearson 36 provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 114L of water capacity and 76L of fuel. The 2012 X-Yachts Xp 44 offers 7 berths in 3 cabins with 270L water and 140L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1981 Pearson 36 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2012 X-Yachts Xp 44 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1981 Pearson 36 · 2012 X-Yachts Xp 44