1981 Nautor Swan 36 vs 1983 Pearson 31 — Comparison

1981 Nautor Swan 36 1981 Nautor Swan 36
VS
1983 Pearson 31 1983 Pearson 31

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1981 Nautor Swan 36 1983 Pearson 31
General
Manufacturer Nautor Swan Pearson
Year 1981–1989 1983–1990
Type Sloop Sloop
Country Finland USA
Designer Sparkman & Stephens William Shaw
Dimensions
LOA 10.97 m (36.0 ft) 9.45 m (31.0 ft)
LWL 8.53 m (28.0 ft) 7.77 m (25.5 ft)
Beam 3.35 m (11.0 ft) 3.10 m (10.2 ft)
Draft 1.98 m (6.5 ft) 1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement 6,350 kg (13,999 lbs) 4,309 kg (9,500 lbs)
Ballast 2,722 kg (6,001 lbs) 1,814 kg (3,999 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 54.5 m² (587 ft²) 40.0 m² (431 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 28 HP 18 HP
Fuel Capacity 100 L (26.4 gal) 68 L (18.0 gal)
Water Capacity 180 L (47.6 gal) 114 L (30.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 6 6
Cabins 2 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1981 Nautor Swan 36
16.15
1983 Pearson 31
15.35
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1981 Nautor Swan 36
42.87
1983 Pearson 31
42.10
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1981 Nautor Swan 36
0.72
1983 Pearson 31
0.76
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1981 Nautor Swan 36
22.73
1983 Pearson 31
21.43

Detailed Comparison

The 1981 Nautor Swan 36 and 1983 Pearson 31 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1981 Nautor Swan 36 is a 1980s design by Nautor Swan from Finland, while the 1983 Pearson 31 is a 1980s offering from Pearson from USA. The 1981 Nautor Swan 36 was penned by Sparkman & Stephens. The 1983 Pearson 31 was designed by William Shaw.

In terms of size, the 1981 Nautor Swan 36 measures 10.97m (36.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.35m, compared to the 1983 Pearson 31 at 9.45m (31.0ft) with a 3.10m beam. The 1981 Nautor Swan 36 is 1.52m longer than the 1983 Pearson 31. The 1981 Nautor Swan 36 displaces approximately 47% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1981 Nautor Swan 36 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.15 and 54.5 m² of sail area. The 1983 Pearson 31, with an SA/D of 15.35 and 40.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1981 Nautor Swan 36 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1981 Nautor Swan 36 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 22.7) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.72). The 1983 Pearson 31 has a comfort ratio of 21.4 and a capsize screening value of 0.76. The ballast ratios are 42.9% for the 1981 Nautor Swan 36 and 42.1% for the 1983 Pearson 31, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1981 Nautor Swan 36 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 180L of water capacity and 100L of fuel. The 1983 Pearson 31 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L water and 68L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1981 Nautor Swan 36 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1981 Nautor Swan 36 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS