1981 Nautor Swan 36 vs 1990 Feeling 32 — Comparison

1981 Nautor Swan 36
VS
1990 Feeling 321990 Feeling 32

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1981 Nautor Swan 361990 Feeling 32
General
ManufacturerNautor SwanFeeling
Year1981–19891990–1998
TypeSloopSloop
CountryFinlandFrance
DesignerSparkman & StephensPhilippe Harlé
Dimensions
LOA10.97 m (36.0 ft)9.85 m (32.3 ft)
LWL8.53 m (28.0 ft)8.20 m (26.9 ft)
Beam3.35 m (11.0 ft)3.15 m (10.3 ft)
Draft1.98 m (6.5 ft)1.50 m (4.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement6,350 kg (13,999 lbs)4,700 kg (10,362 lbs)
Ballast2,722 kg (6,001 lbs)1,700 kg (3,748 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area54.5 m² (587 ft²)40.0 m² (431 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine28 HP18 HP
Fuel Capacity100 L (26.4 gal)60 L (15.9 gal)
Water Capacity180 L (47.6 gal)120 L (31.7 gal)
Accommodation
Berths65
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1981 Nautor Swan 36
16.15
1990 Feeling 32
14.49
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1981 Nautor Swan 36
42.87
1990 Feeling 32
36.17
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1981 Nautor Swan 36
0.72
1990 Feeling 32
0.75
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1981 Nautor Swan 36
22.73
1990 Feeling 32
20.72

Detailed Comparison

The 1981 Nautor Swan 36 and 1990 Feeling 32 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1981 Nautor Swan 36 is a 1980s design by Nautor Swan from Finland, while the 1990 Feeling 32 is a 1990s offering from Feeling from France. The 1981 Nautor Swan 36 was penned by Sparkman & Stephens. The 1990 Feeling 32 was designed by Philippe Harlé.

In terms of size, the 1981 Nautor Swan 36 measures 10.97m (36.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.35m, compared to the 1990 Feeling 32 at 9.85m (32.3ft) with a 3.15m beam. The 1981 Nautor Swan 36 is 1.12m longer than the 1990 Feeling 32. The 1981 Nautor Swan 36 displaces approximately 35% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1981 Nautor Swan 36 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.15 and 54.5 m² of sail area. The 1990 Feeling 32, with an SA/D of 14.49 and 40.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 1981 Nautor Swan 36 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1981 Nautor Swan 36 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 22.7) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.72). The 1990 Feeling 32 has a comfort ratio of 20.7 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 42.9% for the 1981 Nautor Swan 36 and 36.2% for the 1990 Feeling 32, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1981 Nautor Swan 36 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 180L of water capacity and 100L of fuel. The 1990 Feeling 32 offers 5 berths in 2 cabins with 120L water and 60L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1981 Nautor Swan 36 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1981 Nautor Swan 36 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1981 Nautor Swan 36 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1981 Nautor Swan 36 · 1990 Feeling 32