1981 Nautor Swan 36 vs 2012 Beneteau Oceanis 41 — Comparison

1981 Nautor Swan 36
VS
2012 Beneteau Oceanis 412012 Beneteau Oceanis 41

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1981 Nautor Swan 362012 Beneteau Oceanis 41
General
ManufacturerNautor SwanBeneteau
Year1981–19892012–2016
TypeSloopSloop
CountryFinlandFrance
DesignerSparkman & StephensFinot-Conq
Dimensions
LOA10.97 m (36.0 ft)12.43 m (40.8 ft)
LWL8.53 m (28.0 ft)10.89 m (35.7 ft)
Beam3.35 m (11.0 ft)3.99 m (13.1 ft)
Draft1.98 m (6.5 ft)2.10 m (6.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement6,350 kg (13,999 lbs)8,500 kg (18,739 lbs)
Ballast2,722 kg (6,001 lbs)2,600 kg (5,732 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area54.5 m² (587 ft²)74.0 m² (797 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine28 HP40 HP
Fuel Capacity100 L (26.4 gal)140 L (37.0 gal)
Water Capacity180 L (47.6 gal)250 L (66.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths68
Cabins23

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1981 Nautor Swan 36
16.15
2012 Beneteau Oceanis 41
18.05
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1981 Nautor Swan 36
42.87
2012 Beneteau Oceanis 41
30.59
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1981 Nautor Swan 36
0.72
2012 Beneteau Oceanis 41
0.78
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1981 Nautor Swan 36
22.73
2012 Beneteau Oceanis 41
16.04

Detailed Comparison

The 1981 Nautor Swan 36 and 2012 Beneteau Oceanis 41 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1981 Nautor Swan 36 is a 1980s design by Nautor Swan from Finland, while the 2012 Beneteau Oceanis 41 is a modern offering from Beneteau from France. The 1981 Nautor Swan 36 was penned by Sparkman & Stephens. The 2012 Beneteau Oceanis 41 was designed by Finot-Conq.

In terms of size, the 1981 Nautor Swan 36 measures 10.97m (36.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.35m, compared to the 2012 Beneteau Oceanis 41 at 12.43m (40.8ft) with a 3.99m beam. The 2012 Beneteau Oceanis 41 is 1.46m longer than the 1981 Nautor Swan 36. The 2012 Beneteau Oceanis 41 displaces approximately 34% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1981 Nautor Swan 36 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.15 and 54.5 m² of sail area. The 2012 Beneteau Oceanis 41, with an SA/D of 18.05 and 74.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 2012 Beneteau Oceanis 41 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1981 Nautor Swan 36 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 22.7) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.72). The 2012 Beneteau Oceanis 41 has a comfort ratio of 16.0 and a capsize screening value of 0.78. The ballast ratios are 42.9% for the 1981 Nautor Swan 36 and 30.6% for the 2012 Beneteau Oceanis 41, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1981 Nautor Swan 36 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 180L of water capacity and 100L of fuel. The 2012 Beneteau Oceanis 41 offers 8 berths in 3 cabins with 250L water and 140L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1981 Nautor Swan 36 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2012 Beneteau Oceanis 41 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 2012 Beneteau Oceanis 41 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1981 Nautor Swan 36 · 2012 Beneteau Oceanis 41