1981 Nautor Swan 36 vs 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 — Comparison

1981 Nautor Swan 36
VS
2013 Beneteau Figaro 32013 Beneteau Figaro 3

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1981 Nautor Swan 362013 Beneteau Figaro 3
General
ManufacturerNautor SwanBeneteau
Year1981–19892013
TypeSloopSloop
CountryFinlandFrance
DesignerSparkman & StephensVPLP / Van Peteghem Lauriot-Prévost
Dimensions
LOA10.97 m (36.0 ft)10.10 m (33.1 ft)
LWL8.53 m (28.0 ft)9.45 m (31.0 ft)
Beam3.35 m (11.0 ft)3.40 m (11.2 ft)
Draft1.98 m (6.5 ft)2.10 m (6.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement6,350 kg (13,999 lbs)3,450 kg (7,606 lbs)
Ballast2,722 kg (6,001 lbs)1,500 kg (3,307 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area54.5 m² (587 ft²)65.0 m² (700 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine28 HP20 HP
Fuel Capacity100 L (26.4 gal)60 L (15.9 gal)
Water Capacity180 L (47.6 gal)40 L (10.6 gal)
Accommodation
Berths62
Cabins21

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1981 Nautor Swan 36
16.15
2013 Beneteau Figaro 3
28.93
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1981 Nautor Swan 36
42.87
2013 Beneteau Figaro 3
43.48
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1981 Nautor Swan 36
0.72
2013 Beneteau Figaro 3
0.90
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1981 Nautor Swan 36
22.73
2013 Beneteau Figaro 3
11.16

Detailed Comparison

The 1981 Nautor Swan 36 and 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1981 Nautor Swan 36 is a 1980s design by Nautor Swan from Finland, while the 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 is a modern offering from Beneteau from France. The 1981 Nautor Swan 36 was penned by Sparkman & Stephens. The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 was designed by VPLP / Van Peteghem Lauriot-Prévost.

In terms of size, the 1981 Nautor Swan 36 measures 10.97m (36.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.35m, compared to the 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 at 10.10m (33.1ft) with a 3.40m beam. The 1981 Nautor Swan 36 is 0.87m longer than the 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3. The 1981 Nautor Swan 36 displaces approximately 84% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1981 Nautor Swan 36 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.15 and 54.5 m² of sail area. The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3, with an SA/D of 28.93 and 65.0 m² of canvas, offers generous sail power for spirited sailing. The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1981 Nautor Swan 36 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 22.7) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.72). The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 has a comfort ratio of 11.2 and a capsize screening value of 0.90. The ballast ratios are 42.9% for the 1981 Nautor Swan 36 and 43.5% for the 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1981 Nautor Swan 36 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 180L of water capacity and 100L of fuel. The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 offers 2 berths in 1 cabin with 40L water and 60L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1981 Nautor Swan 36 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1981 Nautor Swan 36 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1981 Nautor Swan 36 · 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3