1982 Hunter 34 vs Hunter 33 — Comparison

1982 Hunter 341982 Hunter 34
VS
Hunter 33Hunter 33

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1982 Hunter 34Hunter 33
General
ManufacturerHunterHunter
Year1982–19881988–1994
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerHunter Design TeamHunter Design Team
Dimensions
LOA10.36 m (34.0 ft)10.06 m (33.0 ft)
LWL8.53 m (28.0 ft)8.53 m (28.0 ft)
Beam3.51 m (11.5 ft)3.35 m (11.0 ft)
Draft1.52 m (5.0 ft)1.68 m (5.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement5,443 kg (12,000 lbs)4,763 kg (10,501 lbs)
Ballast2,177 kg (4,799 lbs)1,814 kg (3,999 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area50.2 m² (540 ft²)48.0 m² (517 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine22 HP21 HP
Fuel Capacity95 L (25.1 gal)76 L (20.1 gal)
Water Capacity152 L (40.2 gal)151 L (39.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths76
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1982 Hunter 34
16.48
Hunter 33
17.23
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1982 Hunter 34
40.00
Hunter 33
38.09
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1982 Hunter 34
0.80
Hunter 33
0.80
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1982 Hunter 34
19.05
Hunter 33
18.10

Detailed Comparison

The 1982 Hunter 34 and Hunter 33 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1982 Hunter 34 is a 1980s design by Hunter from USA, while the Hunter 33 is a 1980s offering from Hunter from USA. The 1982 Hunter 34 was penned by Hunter Design Team. The Hunter 33 was designed by Hunter Design Team.

In terms of size, the 1982 Hunter 34 measures 10.36m (34.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.51m, compared to the Hunter 33 at 10.06m (33.0ft) with a 3.35m beam. The 1982 Hunter 34 is 0.30m longer than the Hunter 33. The 1982 Hunter 34 displaces approximately 14% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1982 Hunter 34 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.48 and 50.2 m² of sail area. The Hunter 33, with an SA/D of 17.23 and 48.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The Hunter 33 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1982 Hunter 34 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 19.1) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.80). The Hunter 33 has a comfort ratio of 18.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.80. The ballast ratios are 40.0% for the 1982 Hunter 34 and 38.1% for the Hunter 33, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1982 Hunter 34 provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 152L of water capacity and 95L of fuel. The Hunter 33 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 151L water and 76L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1982 Hunter 34 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hunter 33 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1982 Hunter 34 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1982 Hunter 34 · Hunter 33