1982 Hunter 34 vs Catalina 390 — Comparison
1982 Hunter 34
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | 1982 Hunter 34 | Catalina 390 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | Hunter | Catalina |
| Year | 1982–1988 | 1997–2003 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | USA | USA |
| Designer | Hunter Design Team | Gerry Douglas |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 10.36 m (34.0 ft) | 11.89 m (39.0 ft) |
| LWL | 8.53 m (28.0 ft) | 10.21 m (33.5 ft) |
| Beam | 3.51 m (11.5 ft) | 3.76 m (12.3 ft) |
| Draft | 1.52 m (5.0 ft) | 1.98 m (6.5 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 5,443 kg (12,000 lbs) | 8,256 kg (18,201 lbs) |
| Ballast | 2,177 kg (4,799 lbs) | 3,266 kg (7,200 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 50.2 m² (540 ft²) | 65.5 m² (705 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Fin | Fin |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 22 HP | 35 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 95 L (25.1 gal) | 114 L (30.1 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 152 L (40.2 gal) | 265 L (70.0 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 7 | 7 |
| Cabins | 2 | 2 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The 1982 Hunter 34 and Catalina 390 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1982 Hunter 34 is a 1980s design by Hunter from USA, while the Catalina 390 is a 1990s offering from Catalina from USA. The 1982 Hunter 34 was penned by Hunter Design Team. The Catalina 390 was designed by Gerry Douglas.
In terms of size, the 1982 Hunter 34 measures 10.36m (34.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.51m, compared to the Catalina 390 at 11.89m (39.0ft) with a 3.76m beam. The Catalina 390 is 1.53m longer than the 1982 Hunter 34. The Catalina 390 displaces approximately 52% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the 1982 Hunter 34 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.48 and 50.2 m² of sail area. The Catalina 390, with an SA/D of 16.29 and 65.5 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1982 Hunter 34 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the 1982 Hunter 34 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 19.1) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.80). The Catalina 390 has a comfort ratio of 18.9 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 40.0% for the 1982 Hunter 34 and 39.6% for the Catalina 390, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the 1982 Hunter 34 provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 152L of water capacity and 95L of fuel. The Catalina 390 offers 7 berths in 2 cabins with 265L water and 114L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The 1982 Hunter 34 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The 1982 Hunter 34 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.
Compare Different Boats
Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats
Or view individual specs: 1982 Hunter 34 · Catalina 390