1982 Hunter 34 vs 2012 Beneteau Oceanis 41 — Comparison

1982 Hunter 341982 Hunter 34
VS
2012 Beneteau Oceanis 412012 Beneteau Oceanis 41

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1982 Hunter 342012 Beneteau Oceanis 41
General
ManufacturerHunterBeneteau
Year1982–19882012–2016
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAFrance
DesignerHunter Design TeamFinot-Conq
Dimensions
LOA10.36 m (34.0 ft)12.43 m (40.8 ft)
LWL8.53 m (28.0 ft)10.89 m (35.7 ft)
Beam3.51 m (11.5 ft)3.99 m (13.1 ft)
Draft1.52 m (5.0 ft)2.10 m (6.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement5,443 kg (12,000 lbs)8,500 kg (18,739 lbs)
Ballast2,177 kg (4,799 lbs)2,600 kg (5,732 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area50.2 m² (540 ft²)74.0 m² (797 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine22 HP40 HP
Fuel Capacity95 L (25.1 gal)140 L (37.0 gal)
Water Capacity152 L (40.2 gal)250 L (66.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths78
Cabins23

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1982 Hunter 34
16.48
2012 Beneteau Oceanis 41
18.05
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1982 Hunter 34
40.00
2012 Beneteau Oceanis 41
30.59
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1982 Hunter 34
0.80
2012 Beneteau Oceanis 41
0.78
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1982 Hunter 34
19.05
2012 Beneteau Oceanis 41
16.04

Detailed Comparison

The 1982 Hunter 34 and 2012 Beneteau Oceanis 41 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1982 Hunter 34 is a 1980s design by Hunter from USA, while the 2012 Beneteau Oceanis 41 is a modern offering from Beneteau from France. The 1982 Hunter 34 was penned by Hunter Design Team. The 2012 Beneteau Oceanis 41 was designed by Finot-Conq.

In terms of size, the 1982 Hunter 34 measures 10.36m (34.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.51m, compared to the 2012 Beneteau Oceanis 41 at 12.43m (40.8ft) with a 3.99m beam. The 2012 Beneteau Oceanis 41 is 2.07m longer than the 1982 Hunter 34. The 2012 Beneteau Oceanis 41 displaces approximately 56% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1982 Hunter 34 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.48 and 50.2 m² of sail area. The 2012 Beneteau Oceanis 41, with an SA/D of 18.05 and 74.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 2012 Beneteau Oceanis 41 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1982 Hunter 34 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 19.1) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.80). The 2012 Beneteau Oceanis 41 has a comfort ratio of 16.0 and a capsize screening value of 0.78. The ballast ratios are 40.0% for the 1982 Hunter 34 and 30.6% for the 2012 Beneteau Oceanis 41, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1982 Hunter 34 provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 152L of water capacity and 95L of fuel. The 2012 Beneteau Oceanis 41 offers 8 berths in 3 cabins with 250L water and 140L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1982 Hunter 34 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2012 Beneteau Oceanis 41 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 2012 Beneteau Oceanis 41 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1982 Hunter 34 · 2012 Beneteau Oceanis 41