1982 Hunter 34 vs Beneteau Oceanis 34.1 — Comparison

1982 Hunter 34 1982 Hunter 34
VS
Beneteau Oceanis 34.1 Beneteau Oceanis 34.1

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1982 Hunter 34 Beneteau Oceanis 34.1
General
Manufacturer Hunter Beneteau
Year 1982–1988 2016
Type Sloop Sloop
Country USA France
Designer Hunter Design Team Marc Lombard
Dimensions
LOA 10.36 m (34.0 ft) 10.34 m (33.9 ft)
LWL 8.53 m (28.0 ft) 9.35 m (30.7 ft)
Beam 3.51 m (11.5 ft) 3.39 m (11.1 ft)
Draft 1.52 m (5.0 ft) 1.75 m (5.7 ft)
Weight
Displacement 5,443 kg (12,000 lbs) 5,200 kg (11,464 lbs)
Ballast 2,177 kg (4,799 lbs) 1,600 kg (3,527 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 50.2 m² (540 ft²) 52.0 m² (560 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 22 HP 21 HP
Fuel Capacity 95 L (25.1 gal) 120 L (31.7 gal)
Water Capacity 152 L (40.2 gal) 200 L (52.8 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 7 6
Cabins 2 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1982 Hunter 34
16.48
Beneteau Oceanis 34.1
17.60
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1982 Hunter 34
40.00
Beneteau Oceanis 34.1
30.77
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1982 Hunter 34
0.80
Beneteau Oceanis 34.1
0.78
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1982 Hunter 34
19.05
Beneteau Oceanis 34.1
16.89

Detailed Comparison

The 1982 Hunter 34 and Beneteau Oceanis 34.1 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1982 Hunter 34 is a 1980s design by Hunter from USA, while the Beneteau Oceanis 34.1 is a modern offering from Beneteau from France. The 1982 Hunter 34 was penned by Hunter Design Team. The Beneteau Oceanis 34.1 was designed by Marc Lombard.

In terms of size, the 1982 Hunter 34 measures 10.36m (34.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.51m, compared to the Beneteau Oceanis 34.1 at 10.34m (33.9ft) with a 3.39m beam. The 1982 Hunter 34 is 0.02m longer than the Beneteau Oceanis 34.1. The 1982 Hunter 34 displaces approximately 5% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1982 Hunter 34 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.48 and 50.2 m² of sail area. The Beneteau Oceanis 34.1, with an SA/D of 17.60 and 52.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The Beneteau Oceanis 34.1 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1982 Hunter 34 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 19.1) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.80). The Beneteau Oceanis 34.1 has a comfort ratio of 16.9 and a capsize screening value of 0.78. The ballast ratios are 40.0% for the 1982 Hunter 34 and 30.8% for the Beneteau Oceanis 34.1, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1982 Hunter 34 provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 152L of water capacity and 95L of fuel. The Beneteau Oceanis 34.1 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 200L water and 120L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1982 Hunter 34 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Beneteau Oceanis 34.1 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1982 Hunter 34 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS