1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 vs 1988 Westerly Corsair — Comparison

1982 Pacific Seacraft 27
VS
1988 Westerly Corsair1988 Westerly Corsair

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1982 Pacific Seacraft 271988 Westerly Corsair
General
ManufacturerPacific SeacraftWesterly
Year1982–20051988–1994
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUK
DesignerWilliam CrealockEd Dubois
Dimensions
LOA8.23 m (27.0 ft)11.00 m (36.1 ft)
LWL6.55 m (21.5 ft)9.14 m (30.0 ft)
Beam2.64 m (8.7 ft)3.50 m (11.5 ft)
Draft1.14 m (3.7 ft)1.07 m (3.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement3,175 kg (7,000 lbs)6,350 kg (13,999 lbs)
Ballast1,361 kg (3,000 lbs)2,450 kg (5,401 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area30.5 m² (328 ft²)50.0 m² (538 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFullBilge
Engine & Tanks
Engine15 HP28 HP
Fuel Capacity45 L (11.9 gal)100 L (26.4 gal)
Water Capacity76 L (20.1 gal)200 L (52.8 gal)
Accommodation
Berths47
Cabins13

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1982 Pacific Seacraft 27
14.35
1988 Westerly Corsair
14.81
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1982 Pacific Seacraft 27
42.87
1988 Westerly Corsair
38.58
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1982 Pacific Seacraft 27
0.72
1988 Westerly Corsair
0.76
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1982 Pacific Seacraft 27
26.91
1988 Westerly Corsair
19.55

Detailed Comparison

The 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 and 1988 Westerly Corsair represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 is a 1980s design by Pacific Seacraft from USA, while the 1988 Westerly Corsair is a 1980s offering from Westerly from UK. The 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 was penned by William Crealock. The 1988 Westerly Corsair was designed by Ed Dubois.

In terms of size, the 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 measures 8.23m (27.0ft) overall with a beam of 2.64m, compared to the 1988 Westerly Corsair at 11.00m (36.1ft) with a 3.50m beam. The 1988 Westerly Corsair is 2.77m longer than the 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27. The 1988 Westerly Corsair displaces approximately 100% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 has modest sail power for its displacement with an SA/D ratio of 14.35 and 30.5 m² of sail area. The 1988 Westerly Corsair, with an SA/D of 14.81 and 50.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 1988 Westerly Corsair has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 26.9) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.72). The 1988 Westerly Corsair has a comfort ratio of 19.6 and a capsize screening value of 0.76. The ballast ratios are 42.9% for the 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 and 38.6% for the 1988 Westerly Corsair, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 provides 4 berths in 1 cabin with 76L of water capacity and 45L of fuel. The 1988 Westerly Corsair offers 7 berths in 3 cabins with 200L water and 100L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1988 Westerly Corsair has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1988 Westerly Corsair offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 · 1988 Westerly Corsair