1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 vs 2009 Beneteau Oceanis 34 — Comparison
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 | 2009 Beneteau Oceanis 34 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | Pacific Seacraft | Beneteau |
| Year | 1982–2005 | 2009–2013 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | USA | France |
| Designer | William Crealock | Finot-Conq |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 8.23 m (27.0 ft) | 10.44 m (34.3 ft) |
| LWL | 6.55 m (21.5 ft) | 9.20 m (30.2 ft) |
| Beam | 2.64 m (8.7 ft) | 3.42 m (11.2 ft) |
| Draft | 1.14 m (3.7 ft) | 1.80 m (5.9 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 3,175 kg (7,000 lbs) | 5,550 kg (12,236 lbs) |
| Ballast | 1,361 kg (3,000 lbs) | 1,600 kg (3,527 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 30.5 m² (328 ft²) | 51.0 m² (549 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Full | Fin |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 15 HP | 21 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 45 L (11.9 gal) | 80 L (21.1 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 76 L (20.1 gal) | 150 L (39.6 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 4 | 6 |
| Cabins | 1 | 2 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 and 2009 Beneteau Oceanis 34 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 is a 1980s design by Pacific Seacraft from USA, while the 2009 Beneteau Oceanis 34 is a 2000s offering from Beneteau from France. The 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 was penned by William Crealock. The 2009 Beneteau Oceanis 34 was designed by Finot-Conq.
In terms of size, the 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 measures 8.23m (27.0ft) overall with a beam of 2.64m, compared to the 2009 Beneteau Oceanis 34 at 10.44m (34.3ft) with a 3.42m beam. The 2009 Beneteau Oceanis 34 is 2.21m longer than the 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27. The 2009 Beneteau Oceanis 34 displaces approximately 75% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 has modest sail power for its displacement with an SA/D ratio of 14.35 and 30.5 m² of sail area. The 2009 Beneteau Oceanis 34, with an SA/D of 16.53 and 51.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 2009 Beneteau Oceanis 34 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 26.9) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.72). The 2009 Beneteau Oceanis 34 has a comfort ratio of 18.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.77. The ballast ratios are 42.9% for the 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 and 28.8% for the 2009 Beneteau Oceanis 34, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 provides 4 berths in 1 cabin with 76L of water capacity and 45L of fuel. The 2009 Beneteau Oceanis 34 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 150L water and 80L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The 2009 Beneteau Oceanis 34 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: The 2009 Beneteau Oceanis 34 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.
Compare Different Boats
Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats
Or view individual specs: 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 · 2009 Beneteau Oceanis 34