1982 S2 11.0A vs 1979 Westerly Fulmar — Comparison

1982 S2 11.0A1982 S2 11.0A
VS
1979 Westerly Fulmar1979 Westerly Fulmar

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1982 S2 11.0A1979 Westerly Fulmar
General
ManufacturerS2Westerly
Year1982–19871979–1986
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUK
DesignerArthur EdmundsEd Dubois
Dimensions
LOA10.97 m (36.0 ft)9.75 m (32.0 ft)
LWL9.14 m (30.0 ft)8.00 m (26.2 ft)
Beam3.40 m (11.2 ft)3.20 m (10.5 ft)
Draft1.68 m (5.5 ft)1.07 m (3.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement5,670 kg (12,500 lbs)4,990 kg (11,001 lbs)
Ballast2,268 kg (5,000 lbs)1,814 kg (3,999 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area55.0 m² (592 ft²)36.0 m² (388 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinBilge
Engine & Tanks
Engine22 HP18 HP
Fuel Capacity76 L (20.1 gal)68 L (18.0 gal)
Water Capacity114 L (30.1 gal)136 L (35.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths66
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1982 S2 11.0A
17.57
1979 Westerly Fulmar
12.53
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1982 S2 11.0A
40.00
1979 Westerly Fulmar
36.35
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1982 S2 11.0A
0.76
1979 Westerly Fulmar
0.75
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1982 S2 11.0A
18.18
1979 Westerly Fulmar
22.41

Detailed Comparison

The 1982 S2 11.0A and 1979 Westerly Fulmar represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1982 S2 11.0A is a 1980s design by S2 from USA, while the 1979 Westerly Fulmar is a 1970s offering from Westerly from UK. The 1982 S2 11.0A was penned by Arthur Edmunds. The 1979 Westerly Fulmar was designed by Ed Dubois.

In terms of size, the 1982 S2 11.0A measures 10.97m (36.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.40m, compared to the 1979 Westerly Fulmar at 9.75m (32.0ft) with a 3.20m beam. The 1982 S2 11.0A is 1.22m longer than the 1979 Westerly Fulmar. The 1982 S2 11.0A displaces approximately 14% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1982 S2 11.0A has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.57 and 55.0 m² of sail area. The 1979 Westerly Fulmar, with an SA/D of 12.53 and 36.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 1982 S2 11.0A has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1982 S2 11.0A offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 18.2) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.76). The 1979 Westerly Fulmar has a comfort ratio of 22.4 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 40.0% for the 1982 S2 11.0A and 36.4% for the 1979 Westerly Fulmar, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1982 S2 11.0A provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L of water capacity and 76L of fuel. The 1979 Westerly Fulmar offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 136L water and 68L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1979 Westerly Fulmar is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1982 S2 11.0A has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1982 S2 11.0A · 1979 Westerly Fulmar