1982 S2 11.0A vs 1984 O'Day 30 — Comparison

1982 S2 11.0A1982 S2 11.0A
VS
1984 O'Day 30

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1982 S2 11.0A1984 O'Day 30
General
ManufacturerS2O'Day
Year1982–19871984–1989
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerArthur EdmundsC. Raymond Hunt
Dimensions
LOA10.97 m (36.0 ft)9.14 m (30.0 ft)
LWL9.14 m (30.0 ft)7.62 m (25.0 ft)
Beam3.40 m (11.2 ft)3.05 m (10.0 ft)
Draft1.68 m (5.5 ft)1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement5,670 kg (12,500 lbs)3,629 kg (8,001 lbs)
Ballast2,268 kg (5,000 lbs)1,452 kg (3,201 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area55.0 m² (592 ft²)36.0 m² (388 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine22 HP13 HP
Fuel Capacity76 L (20.1 gal)57 L (15.1 gal)
Water Capacity114 L (30.1 gal)76 L (20.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths66
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1982 S2 11.0A
17.57
1984 O'Day 30
15.49
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1982 S2 11.0A
40.00
1984 O'Day 30
40.01
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1982 S2 11.0A
0.76
1984 O'Day 30
0.79
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1982 S2 11.0A
18.18
1984 O'Day 30
19.36

Detailed Comparison

The 1982 S2 11.0A and 1984 O'Day 30 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1982 S2 11.0A is a 1980s design by S2 from USA, while the 1984 O'Day 30 is a 1980s offering from O'Day from USA. The 1982 S2 11.0A was penned by Arthur Edmunds. The 1984 O'Day 30 was designed by C. Raymond Hunt.

In terms of size, the 1982 S2 11.0A measures 10.97m (36.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.40m, compared to the 1984 O'Day 30 at 9.14m (30.0ft) with a 3.05m beam. The 1982 S2 11.0A is 1.83m longer than the 1984 O'Day 30. The 1982 S2 11.0A displaces approximately 56% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1982 S2 11.0A has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.57 and 55.0 m² of sail area. The 1984 O'Day 30, with an SA/D of 15.49 and 36.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1982 S2 11.0A has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1982 S2 11.0A offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 18.2) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.76). The 1984 O'Day 30 has a comfort ratio of 19.4 and a capsize screening value of 0.79. The ballast ratios are 40.0% for the 1982 S2 11.0A and 40.0% for the 1984 O'Day 30, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1982 S2 11.0A provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L of water capacity and 76L of fuel. The 1984 O'Day 30 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 76L water and 57L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1984 O'Day 30 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1982 S2 11.0A has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1982 S2 11.0A · 1984 O'Day 30