1982 S2 11.0A vs Catalina 34 MkII — Comparison

1982 S2 11.0A1982 S2 11.0A
VS
Catalina 34 MkII

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1982 S2 11.0ACatalina 34 MkII
General
ManufacturerS2Catalina
Year1982–19871995–2004
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerArthur EdmundsGerry Douglas
Dimensions
LOA10.97 m (36.0 ft)10.36 m (34.0 ft)
LWL9.14 m (30.0 ft)9.14 m (30.0 ft)
Beam3.40 m (11.2 ft)3.40 m (11.2 ft)
Draft1.68 m (5.5 ft)1.75 m (5.7 ft)
Weight
Displacement5,670 kg (12,500 lbs)5,443 kg (12,000 lbs)
Ballast2,268 kg (5,000 lbs)2,041 kg (4,500 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area55.0 m² (592 ft²)52.0 m² (560 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine22 HP21 HP
Fuel Capacity76 L (20.1 gal)76 L (20.1 gal)
Water Capacity114 L (30.1 gal)151 L (39.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths66
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1982 S2 11.0A
17.57
Catalina 34 MkII
17.08
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1982 S2 11.0A
40.00
Catalina 34 MkII
37.50
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1982 S2 11.0A
0.76
Catalina 34 MkII
0.77
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1982 S2 11.0A
18.18
Catalina 34 MkII
18.13

Detailed Comparison

The 1982 S2 11.0A and Catalina 34 MkII represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1982 S2 11.0A is a 1980s design by S2 from USA, while the Catalina 34 MkII is a 1990s offering from Catalina from USA. The 1982 S2 11.0A was penned by Arthur Edmunds. The Catalina 34 MkII was designed by Gerry Douglas.

In terms of size, the 1982 S2 11.0A measures 10.97m (36.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.40m, compared to the Catalina 34 MkII at 10.36m (34.0ft) with a 3.40m beam. The 1982 S2 11.0A is 0.61m longer than the Catalina 34 MkII. The 1982 S2 11.0A displaces approximately 4% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1982 S2 11.0A has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.57 and 55.0 m² of sail area. The Catalina 34 MkII, with an SA/D of 17.08 and 52.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 1982 S2 11.0A has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1982 S2 11.0A offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 18.2) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.76). The Catalina 34 MkII has a comfort ratio of 18.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.77. The ballast ratios are 40.0% for the 1982 S2 11.0A and 37.5% for the Catalina 34 MkII, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1982 S2 11.0A provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L of water capacity and 76L of fuel. The Catalina 34 MkII offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 151L water and 76L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1982 S2 11.0A is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1982 S2 11.0A has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1982 S2 11.0A · Catalina 34 MkII