1982 S2 11.0A vs 1996 Moody 45 — Comparison
1982 S2 11.0A
1996 Moody 45
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | 1982 S2 11.0A | 1996 Moody 45 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | S2 | Moody |
| Year | 1982–1987 | 1996–2002 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | USA | UK |
| Designer | Arthur Edmunds | Bill Dixon |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 10.97 m (36.0 ft) | 13.72 m (45.0 ft) |
| LWL | 9.14 m (30.0 ft) | 11.50 m (37.7 ft) |
| Beam | 3.40 m (11.2 ft) | 4.22 m (13.8 ft) |
| Draft | 1.68 m (5.5 ft) | 1.80 m (5.9 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 5,670 kg (12,500 lbs) | 12,500 kg (27,558 lbs) |
| Ballast | 2,268 kg (5,000 lbs) | 4,900 kg (10,803 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 55.0 m² (592 ft²) | 85.0 m² (915 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Fin | Fin |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 22 HP | 55 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 76 L (20.1 gal) | 250 L (66.0 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 114 L (30.1 gal) | 450 L (118.9 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 6 | 8 |
| Cabins | 2 | 3 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The 1982 S2 11.0A and 1996 Moody 45 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1982 S2 11.0A is a 1980s design by S2 from USA, while the 1996 Moody 45 is a 1990s offering from Moody from UK. The 1982 S2 11.0A was penned by Arthur Edmunds. The 1996 Moody 45 was designed by Bill Dixon.
In terms of size, the 1982 S2 11.0A measures 10.97m (36.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.40m, compared to the 1996 Moody 45 at 13.72m (45.0ft) with a 4.22m beam. The 1996 Moody 45 is 2.75m longer than the 1982 S2 11.0A. The 1996 Moody 45 displaces approximately 120% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the 1982 S2 11.0A has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.57 and 55.0 m² of sail area. The 1996 Moody 45, with an SA/D of 16.03 and 85.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1982 S2 11.0A has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the 1982 S2 11.0A offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 18.2) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.76). The 1996 Moody 45 has a comfort ratio of 19.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.73. The ballast ratios are 40.0% for the 1982 S2 11.0A and 39.2% for the 1996 Moody 45, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the 1982 S2 11.0A provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L of water capacity and 76L of fuel. The 1996 Moody 45 offers 8 berths in 3 cabins with 450L water and 250L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The 1996 Moody 45 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The 1982 S2 11.0A has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: The 1996 Moody 45 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.
Compare Different Boats
Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats
Or view individual specs: 1982 S2 11.0A · 1996 Moody 45