1982 S2 11.0A vs Hanse 445 — Comparison

1982 S2 11.0A1982 S2 11.0A
VS
Hanse 445

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1982 S2 11.0AHanse 445
General
ManufacturerS2Hanse
Year1982–19872012–2017
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAGermany
DesignerArthur Edmundsjudel/vrolijk & co
Dimensions
LOA10.97 m (36.0 ft)13.50 m (44.3 ft)
LWL9.14 m (30.0 ft)11.80 m (38.7 ft)
Beam3.40 m (11.2 ft)4.20 m (13.8 ft)
Draft1.68 m (5.5 ft)2.10 m (6.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement5,670 kg (12,500 lbs)10,100 kg (22,267 lbs)
Ballast2,268 kg (5,000 lbs)3,200 kg (7,055 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area55.0 m² (592 ft²)87.0 m² (937 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine22 HP55 HP
Fuel Capacity76 L (20.1 gal)200 L (52.8 gal)
Water Capacity114 L (30.1 gal)370 L (97.7 gal)
Accommodation
Berths68
Cabins23

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1982 S2 11.0A
17.57
Hanse 445
18.91
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1982 S2 11.0A
40.00
Hanse 445
31.68
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1982 S2 11.0A
0.76
Hanse 445
0.78
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1982 S2 11.0A
18.18
Hanse 445
15.14

Detailed Comparison

The 1982 S2 11.0A and Hanse 445 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1982 S2 11.0A is a 1980s design by S2 from USA, while the Hanse 445 is a modern offering from Hanse from Germany. The 1982 S2 11.0A was penned by Arthur Edmunds. The Hanse 445 was designed by judel/vrolijk & co.

In terms of size, the 1982 S2 11.0A measures 10.97m (36.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.40m, compared to the Hanse 445 at 13.50m (44.3ft) with a 4.20m beam. The Hanse 445 is 2.53m longer than the 1982 S2 11.0A. The Hanse 445 displaces approximately 78% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1982 S2 11.0A has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.57 and 55.0 m² of sail area. The Hanse 445, with an SA/D of 18.91 and 87.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The Hanse 445 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1982 S2 11.0A offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 18.2) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.76). The Hanse 445 has a comfort ratio of 15.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.78. The ballast ratios are 40.0% for the 1982 S2 11.0A and 31.7% for the Hanse 445, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1982 S2 11.0A provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L of water capacity and 76L of fuel. The Hanse 445 offers 8 berths in 3 cabins with 370L water and 200L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1982 S2 11.0A is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hanse 445 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The Hanse 445 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1982 S2 11.0A · Hanse 445