1982 S2 11.0A vs 2014 X-Yachts X-40 — Comparison

1982 S2 11.0A1982 S2 11.0A
VS
2014 X-Yachts X-40

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1982 S2 11.0A2014 X-Yachts X-40
General
ManufacturerS2X-Yachts
Year1982–19872014–2019
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSADenmark
DesignerArthur EdmundsNiels Jeppesen
Dimensions
LOA10.97 m (36.0 ft)12.15 m (39.9 ft)
LWL9.14 m (30.0 ft)10.70 m (35.1 ft)
Beam3.40 m (11.2 ft)3.70 m (12.1 ft)
Draft1.68 m (5.5 ft)2.20 m (7.2 ft)
Weight
Displacement5,670 kg (12,500 lbs)8,000 kg (17,637 lbs)
Ballast2,268 kg (5,000 lbs)3,000 kg (6,614 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area55.0 m² (592 ft²)75.0 m² (807 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine22 HP40 HP
Fuel Capacity76 L (20.1 gal)110 L (29.1 gal)
Water Capacity114 L (30.1 gal)220 L (58.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths67
Cabins23

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1982 S2 11.0A
17.57
2014 X-Yachts X-40
19.05
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1982 S2 11.0A
40.00
2014 X-Yachts X-40
37.50
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1982 S2 11.0A
0.76
2014 X-Yachts X-40
0.74
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1982 S2 11.0A
18.18
2014 X-Yachts X-40
17.35

Detailed Comparison

The 1982 S2 11.0A and 2014 X-Yachts X-40 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1982 S2 11.0A is a 1980s design by S2 from USA, while the 2014 X-Yachts X-40 is a modern offering from X-Yachts from Denmark. The 1982 S2 11.0A was penned by Arthur Edmunds. The 2014 X-Yachts X-40 was designed by Niels Jeppesen.

In terms of size, the 1982 S2 11.0A measures 10.97m (36.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.40m, compared to the 2014 X-Yachts X-40 at 12.15m (39.9ft) with a 3.70m beam. The 2014 X-Yachts X-40 is 1.18m longer than the 1982 S2 11.0A. The 2014 X-Yachts X-40 displaces approximately 41% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1982 S2 11.0A has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.57 and 55.0 m² of sail area. The 2014 X-Yachts X-40, with an SA/D of 19.05 and 75.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 2014 X-Yachts X-40 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1982 S2 11.0A offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 18.2) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.76). The 2014 X-Yachts X-40 has a comfort ratio of 17.4 and a capsize screening value of 0.74. The ballast ratios are 40.0% for the 1982 S2 11.0A and 37.5% for the 2014 X-Yachts X-40, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1982 S2 11.0A provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L of water capacity and 76L of fuel. The 2014 X-Yachts X-40 offers 7 berths in 3 cabins with 220L water and 110L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1982 S2 11.0A is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2014 X-Yachts X-40 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 2014 X-Yachts X-40 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1982 S2 11.0A · 2014 X-Yachts X-40