1982 Westerly Konsort vs 1983 Freedom 36 — Comparison

1982 Westerly Konsort 1982 Westerly Konsort
VS
1983 Freedom 36 1983 Freedom 36

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1982 Westerly Konsort 1983 Freedom 36
General
Manufacturer Westerly Freedom
Year 1982–1990 1983–1990
Type Sloop Sloop
Country UK USA
Designer Ed Dubois Garry Hoyt
Dimensions
LOA 9.50 m (31.2 ft) 10.97 m (36.0 ft)
LWL 7.70 m (25.3 ft) 9.14 m (30.0 ft)
Beam 3.10 m (10.2 ft) 3.51 m (11.5 ft)
Draft 1.07 m (3.5 ft) 1.37 m (4.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement 4,536 kg (10,000 lbs) 6,123 kg (13,499 lbs)
Ballast 1,633 kg (3,600 lbs) 2,268 kg (5,000 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 34.0 m² (366 ft²) 49.0 m² (527 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Bilge Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 15 HP 25 HP
Fuel Capacity 68 L (18.0 gal) 95 L (25.1 gal)
Water Capacity 114 L (30.1 gal) 190 L (50.2 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 6 6
Cabins 2 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1982 Westerly Konsort
12.61
1983 Freedom 36
14.88
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1982 Westerly Konsort
36.00
1983 Freedom 36
37.04
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1982 Westerly Konsort
0.75
1983 Freedom 36
0.77
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1982 Westerly Konsort
22.75
1983 Freedom 36
18.82

Detailed Comparison

The 1982 Westerly Konsort and 1983 Freedom 36 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1982 Westerly Konsort is a 1980s design by Westerly from UK, while the 1983 Freedom 36 is a 1980s offering from Freedom from USA. The 1982 Westerly Konsort was penned by Ed Dubois. The 1983 Freedom 36 was designed by Garry Hoyt.

In terms of size, the 1982 Westerly Konsort measures 9.50m (31.2ft) overall with a beam of 3.10m, compared to the 1983 Freedom 36 at 10.97m (36.0ft) with a 3.51m beam. The 1983 Freedom 36 is 1.47m longer than the 1982 Westerly Konsort. The 1983 Freedom 36 displaces approximately 35% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1982 Westerly Konsort has modest sail power for its displacement with an SA/D ratio of 12.61 and 34.0 m² of sail area. The 1983 Freedom 36, with an SA/D of 14.88 and 49.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 1983 Freedom 36 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1982 Westerly Konsort offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 22.8) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.75). The 1983 Freedom 36 has a comfort ratio of 18.8 and a capsize screening value of 0.77. The ballast ratios are 36.0% for the 1982 Westerly Konsort and 37.0% for the 1983 Freedom 36, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1982 Westerly Konsort provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L of water capacity and 68L of fuel. The 1983 Freedom 36 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 190L water and 95L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1982 Westerly Konsort is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1983 Freedom 36 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS