1983 Pearson 31 vs 1982 Freedom 28 — Comparison

1983 Pearson 311983 Pearson 31
VS
1982 Freedom 281982 Freedom 28

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1983 Pearson 311982 Freedom 28
General
ManufacturerPearsonFreedom
Year1983–19901982–1988
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerWilliam ShawGarry Hoyt
Dimensions
LOA9.45 m (31.0 ft)8.53 m (28.0 ft)
LWL7.77 m (25.5 ft)7.01 m (23.0 ft)
Beam3.10 m (10.2 ft)2.84 m (9.3 ft)
Draft1.52 m (5.0 ft)1.14 m (3.7 ft)
Weight
Displacement4,309 kg (9,500 lbs)2,495 kg (5,501 lbs)
Ballast1,814 kg (3,999 lbs)907 kg (2,000 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area40.0 m² (431 ft²)29.0 m² (312 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine18 HP10 HP
Fuel Capacity68 L (18.0 gal)38 L (10.0 gal)
Water Capacity114 L (30.1 gal)57 L (15.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths65
Cabins21

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1983 Pearson 31
15.35
1982 Freedom 28
16.02
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1983 Pearson 31
42.10
1982 Freedom 28
36.35
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1983 Pearson 31
0.76
1982 Freedom 28
0.84
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1983 Pearson 31
21.43
1982 Freedom 28
17.13

Detailed Comparison

The 1983 Pearson 31 and 1982 Freedom 28 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1983 Pearson 31 is a 1980s design by Pearson from USA, while the 1982 Freedom 28 is a 1980s offering from Freedom from USA. The 1983 Pearson 31 was penned by William Shaw. The 1982 Freedom 28 was designed by Garry Hoyt.

In terms of size, the 1983 Pearson 31 measures 9.45m (31.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.10m, compared to the 1982 Freedom 28 at 8.53m (28.0ft) with a 2.84m beam. The 1983 Pearson 31 is 0.92m longer than the 1982 Freedom 28. The 1983 Pearson 31 displaces approximately 73% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1983 Pearson 31 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.35 and 40.0 m² of sail area. The 1982 Freedom 28, with an SA/D of 16.02 and 29.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1982 Freedom 28 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1983 Pearson 31 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 21.4) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.76). The 1982 Freedom 28 has a comfort ratio of 17.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.84. The ballast ratios are 42.1% for the 1983 Pearson 31 and 36.4% for the 1982 Freedom 28, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1983 Pearson 31 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L of water capacity and 68L of fuel. The 1982 Freedom 28 offers 5 berths in 1 cabin with 57L water and 38L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1983 Pearson 31 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1982 Freedom 28 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1983 Pearson 31 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1983 Pearson 31 · 1982 Freedom 28