1983 Sabre 28 vs 1984 Cape Dory 33 — Comparison

1983 Sabre 28 1983 Sabre 28
VS
1984 Cape Dory 33 1984 Cape Dory 33

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1983 Sabre 28 1984 Cape Dory 33
General
Manufacturer Sabre Cape Dory
Year 1983–1990 1984–1990
Type Sloop Sloop
Country USA USA
Designer Roger Hewson Carl Alberg
Dimensions
LOA 8.53 m (28.0 ft) 10.06 m (33.0 ft)
LWL 7.01 m (23.0 ft) 7.92 m (26.0 ft)
Beam 2.90 m (9.5 ft) 3.12 m (10.2 ft)
Draft 1.37 m (4.5 ft) 1.45 m (4.8 ft)
Weight
Displacement 3,402 kg (7,500 lbs) 4,990 kg (11,001 lbs)
Ballast 1,361 kg (3,000 lbs) 2,177 kg (4,799 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 35.3 m² (380 ft²) 44.0 m² (474 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Full
Engine & Tanks
Engine 15 HP 22 HP
Fuel Capacity 45 L (11.9 gal) 76 L (20.1 gal)
Water Capacity 76 L (20.1 gal) 151 L (39.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 5 5
Cabins 1 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1983 Sabre 28
15.86
1984 Cape Dory 33
15.31
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1983 Sabre 28
40.01
1984 Cape Dory 33
43.63
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1983 Sabre 28
0.77
1984 Cape Dory 33
0.73
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1983 Sabre 28
22.71
1984 Cape Dory 33
22.98

Detailed Comparison

The 1983 Sabre 28 and 1984 Cape Dory 33 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1983 Sabre 28 is a 1980s design by Sabre from USA, while the 1984 Cape Dory 33 is a 1980s offering from Cape Dory from USA. The 1983 Sabre 28 was penned by Roger Hewson. The 1984 Cape Dory 33 was designed by Carl Alberg.

In terms of size, the 1983 Sabre 28 measures 8.53m (28.0ft) overall with a beam of 2.90m, compared to the 1984 Cape Dory 33 at 10.06m (33.0ft) with a 3.12m beam. The 1984 Cape Dory 33 is 1.53m longer than the 1983 Sabre 28. The 1984 Cape Dory 33 displaces approximately 47% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1983 Sabre 28 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.86 and 35.3 m² of sail area. The 1984 Cape Dory 33, with an SA/D of 15.31 and 44.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1983 Sabre 28 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1983 Sabre 28 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 22.7) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.77). The 1984 Cape Dory 33 has a comfort ratio of 23.0 and a capsize screening value of 0.73. The ballast ratios are 40.0% for the 1983 Sabre 28 and 43.6% for the 1984 Cape Dory 33, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1983 Sabre 28 provides 5 berths in 1 cabin with 76L of water capacity and 45L of fuel. The 1984 Cape Dory 33 offers 5 berths in 2 cabins with 151L water and 76L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1984 Cape Dory 33 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1983 Sabre 28 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS