1984 Cape Dory 33 vs 1973 Ranger 33 — Comparison

1984 Cape Dory 33 1984 Cape Dory 33
VS
1973 Ranger 33 1973 Ranger 33

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1984 Cape Dory 33 1973 Ranger 33
General
Manufacturer Cape Dory Ranger
Year 1984–1990 1973–1979
Type Sloop Sloop
Country USA USA
Designer Carl Alberg Gary Mull
Dimensions
LOA 10.06 m (33.0 ft) 10.06 m (33.0 ft)
LWL 7.92 m (26.0 ft) 8.23 m (27.0 ft)
Beam 3.12 m (10.2 ft) 3.05 m (10.0 ft)
Draft 1.45 m (4.8 ft) 1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement 4,990 kg (11,001 lbs) 4,763 kg (10,501 lbs)
Ballast 2,177 kg (4,799 lbs) 2,041 kg (4,500 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 44.0 m² (474 ft²) 43.0 m² (463 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Full Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 22 HP 15 HP
Fuel Capacity 76 L (20.1 gal) 57 L (15.1 gal)
Water Capacity 151 L (39.9 gal) 95 L (25.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 5 6
Cabins 2 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1984 Cape Dory 33
15.31
1973 Ranger 33
15.43
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1984 Cape Dory 33
43.63
1973 Ranger 33
42.85
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1984 Cape Dory 33
0.73
1973 Ranger 33
0.73
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1984 Cape Dory 33
22.98
1973 Ranger 33
21.50

Detailed Comparison

The 1984 Cape Dory 33 and 1973 Ranger 33 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1984 Cape Dory 33 is a 1980s design by Cape Dory from USA, while the 1973 Ranger 33 is a 1970s offering from Ranger from USA. The 1984 Cape Dory 33 was penned by Carl Alberg. The 1973 Ranger 33 was designed by Gary Mull.

In terms of size, the 1984 Cape Dory 33 measures 10.06m (33.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.12m, compared to the 1973 Ranger 33 at 10.06m (33.0ft) with a 3.05m beam. The 1984 Cape Dory 33 displaces approximately 5% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1984 Cape Dory 33 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.31 and 44.0 m² of sail area. The 1973 Ranger 33, with an SA/D of 15.43 and 43.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1973 Ranger 33 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1984 Cape Dory 33 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 23.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.73). The 1973 Ranger 33 has a comfort ratio of 21.5 and a capsize screening value of 0.73. The ballast ratios are 43.6% for the 1984 Cape Dory 33 and 42.9% for the 1973 Ranger 33, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1984 Cape Dory 33 provides 5 berths in 2 cabins with 151L of water capacity and 76L of fuel. The 1973 Ranger 33 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 95L water and 57L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1984 Cape Dory 33 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1973 Ranger 33 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1973 Ranger 33 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS