1984 MacGregor 26 vs 1982 Westerly Konsort — Comparison

1984 MacGregor 26 1984 MacGregor 26
VS
1982 Westerly Konsort 1982 Westerly Konsort

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1984 MacGregor 26 1982 Westerly Konsort
General
Manufacturer MacGregor Westerly
Year 1984–1995 1982–1990
Type Sloop Sloop
Country USA UK
Designer Roger MacGregor Ed Dubois
Dimensions
LOA 7.80 m (25.6 ft) 9.50 m (31.2 ft)
LWL 6.71 m (22.0 ft) 7.70 m (25.3 ft)
Beam 2.59 m (8.5 ft) 3.10 m (10.2 ft)
Draft 0.61 m (2.0 ft) 1.07 m (3.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement 998 kg (2,200 lbs) 4,536 kg (10,000 lbs)
Ballast 227 kg (500 lbs) 1,633 kg (3,600 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 22.3 m² (240 ft²) 34.0 m² (366 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Centerboard Bilge
Engine & Tanks
Engine 5 HP 15 HP
Fuel Capacity 15 L (4.0 gal) 68 L (18.0 gal)
Water Capacity 23 L (6.1 gal) 114 L (30.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 6 6
Cabins 1 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1984 MacGregor 26
22.70
1982 Westerly Konsort
12.61
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1984 MacGregor 26
22.75
1982 Westerly Konsort
36.00
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1984 MacGregor 26
1.04
1982 Westerly Konsort
0.75
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1984 MacGregor 26
8.72
1982 Westerly Konsort
22.75

Detailed Comparison

The 1984 MacGregor 26 and 1982 Westerly Konsort represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1984 MacGregor 26 is a 1980s design by MacGregor from USA, while the 1982 Westerly Konsort is a 1980s offering from Westerly from UK. The 1984 MacGregor 26 was penned by Roger MacGregor. The 1982 Westerly Konsort was designed by Ed Dubois.

In terms of size, the 1984 MacGregor 26 measures 7.80m (25.6ft) overall with a beam of 2.59m, compared to the 1982 Westerly Konsort at 9.50m (31.2ft) with a 3.10m beam. The 1982 Westerly Konsort is 1.70m longer than the 1984 MacGregor 26. The 1982 Westerly Konsort displaces approximately 355% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1984 MacGregor 26 has generous sail power for spirited sailing with an SA/D ratio of 22.70 and 22.3 m² of sail area. The 1982 Westerly Konsort, with an SA/D of 12.61 and 34.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 1984 MacGregor 26 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1984 MacGregor 26 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 8.7) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 1.04). The 1982 Westerly Konsort has a comfort ratio of 22.8 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 22.8% for the 1984 MacGregor 26 and 36.0% for the 1982 Westerly Konsort, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1984 MacGregor 26 provides 6 berths in 1 cabin with 23L of water capacity and 15L of fuel. The 1982 Westerly Konsort offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L water and 68L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1982 Westerly Konsort is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1984 MacGregor 26 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS