1984 Moody 33 vs 1979 Pearson 37 — Comparison
1984 Moody 33
1979 Pearson 37
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | 1984 Moody 33 | 1979 Pearson 37 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | Moody | Pearson |
| Year | 1984–1990 | 1979–1985 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | UK | USA |
| Designer | Bill Dixon | William Shaw |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 10.06 m (33.0 ft) | 11.28 m (37.0 ft) |
| LWL | 8.23 m (27.0 ft) | 8.69 m (28.5 ft) |
| Beam | 3.25 m (10.7 ft) | 3.43 m (11.3 ft) |
| Draft | 1.40 m (4.6 ft) | 1.83 m (6.0 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 5,200 kg (11,464 lbs) | 7,258 kg (16,001 lbs) |
| Ballast | 2,100 kg (4,630 lbs) | 3,084 kg (6,799 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 44.0 m² (474 ft²) | 56.0 m² (603 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Fin | Fin |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 20 HP | 28 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 80 L (21.1 gal) | 95 L (25.1 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 140 L (37.0 gal) | 190 L (50.2 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 6 | 6 |
| Cabins | 2 | 2 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The 1984 Moody 33 and 1979 Pearson 37 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1984 Moody 33 is a 1980s design by Moody from UK, while the 1979 Pearson 37 is a 1970s offering from Pearson from USA. The 1984 Moody 33 was penned by Bill Dixon. The 1979 Pearson 37 was designed by William Shaw.
In terms of size, the 1984 Moody 33 measures 10.06m (33.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.25m, compared to the 1979 Pearson 37 at 11.28m (37.0ft) with a 3.43m beam. The 1979 Pearson 37 is 1.22m longer than the 1984 Moody 33. The 1979 Pearson 37 displaces approximately 40% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the 1984 Moody 33 has modest sail power for its displacement with an SA/D ratio of 14.90 and 44.0 m² of sail area. The 1979 Pearson 37, with an SA/D of 15.18 and 56.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1979 Pearson 37 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the 1984 Moody 33 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 21.6) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.75). The 1979 Pearson 37 has a comfort ratio of 24.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.71. The ballast ratios are 40.4% for the 1984 Moody 33 and 42.5% for the 1979 Pearson 37, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the 1984 Moody 33 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 140L of water capacity and 80L of fuel. The 1979 Pearson 37 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 190L water and 95L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The 1979 Pearson 37 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The 1979 Pearson 37 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.
Compare Different Boats
Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats
Or view individual specs: 1984 Moody 33 · 1979 Pearson 37