1984 Moody 33 vs 1983 Freedom 36 — Comparison

1984 Moody 331984 Moody 33
VS
1983 Freedom 361983 Freedom 36

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1984 Moody 331983 Freedom 36
General
ManufacturerMoodyFreedom
Year1984–19901983–1990
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUKUSA
DesignerBill DixonGarry Hoyt
Dimensions
LOA10.06 m (33.0 ft)10.97 m (36.0 ft)
LWL8.23 m (27.0 ft)9.14 m (30.0 ft)
Beam3.25 m (10.7 ft)3.51 m (11.5 ft)
Draft1.40 m (4.6 ft)1.37 m (4.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement5,200 kg (11,464 lbs)6,123 kg (13,499 lbs)
Ballast2,100 kg (4,630 lbs)2,268 kg (5,000 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area44.0 m² (474 ft²)49.0 m² (527 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine20 HP25 HP
Fuel Capacity80 L (21.1 gal)95 L (25.1 gal)
Water Capacity140 L (37.0 gal)190 L (50.2 gal)
Accommodation
Berths66
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1984 Moody 33
14.90
1983 Freedom 36
14.88
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1984 Moody 33
40.38
1983 Freedom 36
37.04
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1984 Moody 33
0.75
1983 Freedom 36
0.77
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1984 Moody 33
21.57
1983 Freedom 36
18.82

Detailed Comparison

The 1984 Moody 33 and 1983 Freedom 36 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1984 Moody 33 is a 1980s design by Moody from UK, while the 1983 Freedom 36 is a 1980s offering from Freedom from USA. The 1984 Moody 33 was penned by Bill Dixon. The 1983 Freedom 36 was designed by Garry Hoyt.

In terms of size, the 1984 Moody 33 measures 10.06m (33.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.25m, compared to the 1983 Freedom 36 at 10.97m (36.0ft) with a 3.51m beam. The 1983 Freedom 36 is 0.91m longer than the 1984 Moody 33. The 1983 Freedom 36 displaces approximately 18% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1984 Moody 33 has modest sail power for its displacement with an SA/D ratio of 14.90 and 44.0 m² of sail area. The 1983 Freedom 36, with an SA/D of 14.88 and 49.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 1984 Moody 33 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1984 Moody 33 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 21.6) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.75). The 1983 Freedom 36 has a comfort ratio of 18.8 and a capsize screening value of 0.77. The ballast ratios are 40.4% for the 1984 Moody 33 and 37.0% for the 1983 Freedom 36, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1984 Moody 33 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 140L of water capacity and 80L of fuel. The 1983 Freedom 36 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 190L water and 95L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1984 Moody 33 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1984 Moody 33 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1984 Moody 33 · 1983 Freedom 36