1984 Moody 33 vs 1992 Moody 41 — Comparison
1984 Moody 33
1992 Moody 41
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | 1984 Moody 33 | 1992 Moody 41 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | Moody | Moody |
| Year | 1984–1990 | 1992–1998 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | UK | UK |
| Designer | Bill Dixon | Bill Dixon |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 10.06 m (33.0 ft) | 12.50 m (41.0 ft) |
| LWL | 8.23 m (27.0 ft) | 10.36 m (34.0 ft) |
| Beam | 3.25 m (10.7 ft) | 3.86 m (12.7 ft) |
| Draft | 1.40 m (4.6 ft) | 1.70 m (5.6 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 5,200 kg (11,464 lbs) | 9,800 kg (21,605 lbs) |
| Ballast | 2,100 kg (4,630 lbs) | 3,800 kg (8,378 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 44.0 m² (474 ft²) | 70.0 m² (754 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Fin | Fin |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 20 HP | 40 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 80 L (21.1 gal) | 180 L (47.6 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 140 L (37.0 gal) | 360 L (95.1 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 6 | 7 |
| Cabins | 2 | 3 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The 1984 Moody 33 and 1992 Moody 41 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1984 Moody 33 is a 1980s design by Moody from UK, while the 1992 Moody 41 is a 1990s offering from Moody from UK. The 1984 Moody 33 was penned by Bill Dixon. The 1992 Moody 41 was designed by Bill Dixon.
In terms of size, the 1984 Moody 33 measures 10.06m (33.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.25m, compared to the 1992 Moody 41 at 12.50m (41.0ft) with a 3.86m beam. The 1992 Moody 41 is 2.44m longer than the 1984 Moody 33. The 1992 Moody 41 displaces approximately 88% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the 1984 Moody 33 has modest sail power for its displacement with an SA/D ratio of 14.90 and 44.0 m² of sail area. The 1992 Moody 41, with an SA/D of 15.53 and 70.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1992 Moody 41 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the 1984 Moody 33 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 21.6) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.75). The 1992 Moody 41 has a comfort ratio of 20.6 and a capsize screening value of 0.72. The ballast ratios are 40.4% for the 1984 Moody 33 and 38.8% for the 1992 Moody 41, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the 1984 Moody 33 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 140L of water capacity and 80L of fuel. The 1992 Moody 41 offers 7 berths in 3 cabins with 360L water and 180L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The 1984 Moody 33 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The 1992 Moody 41 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: The 1992 Moody 41 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.
Compare Different Boats
Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats
Or view individual specs: 1984 Moody 33 · 1992 Moody 41