1984 Moody 33 vs 2012 Beneteau Oceanis 41 — Comparison

1984 Moody 331984 Moody 33
VS
2012 Beneteau Oceanis 412012 Beneteau Oceanis 41

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1984 Moody 332012 Beneteau Oceanis 41
General
ManufacturerMoodyBeneteau
Year1984–19902012–2016
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUKFrance
DesignerBill DixonFinot-Conq
Dimensions
LOA10.06 m (33.0 ft)12.43 m (40.8 ft)
LWL8.23 m (27.0 ft)10.89 m (35.7 ft)
Beam3.25 m (10.7 ft)3.99 m (13.1 ft)
Draft1.40 m (4.6 ft)2.10 m (6.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement5,200 kg (11,464 lbs)8,500 kg (18,739 lbs)
Ballast2,100 kg (4,630 lbs)2,600 kg (5,732 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area44.0 m² (474 ft²)74.0 m² (797 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine20 HP40 HP
Fuel Capacity80 L (21.1 gal)140 L (37.0 gal)
Water Capacity140 L (37.0 gal)250 L (66.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths68
Cabins23

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1984 Moody 33
14.90
2012 Beneteau Oceanis 41
18.05
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1984 Moody 33
40.38
2012 Beneteau Oceanis 41
30.59
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1984 Moody 33
0.75
2012 Beneteau Oceanis 41
0.78
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1984 Moody 33
21.57
2012 Beneteau Oceanis 41
16.04

Detailed Comparison

The 1984 Moody 33 and 2012 Beneteau Oceanis 41 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1984 Moody 33 is a 1980s design by Moody from UK, while the 2012 Beneteau Oceanis 41 is a modern offering from Beneteau from France. The 1984 Moody 33 was penned by Bill Dixon. The 2012 Beneteau Oceanis 41 was designed by Finot-Conq.

In terms of size, the 1984 Moody 33 measures 10.06m (33.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.25m, compared to the 2012 Beneteau Oceanis 41 at 12.43m (40.8ft) with a 3.99m beam. The 2012 Beneteau Oceanis 41 is 2.37m longer than the 1984 Moody 33. The 2012 Beneteau Oceanis 41 displaces approximately 63% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1984 Moody 33 has modest sail power for its displacement with an SA/D ratio of 14.90 and 44.0 m² of sail area. The 2012 Beneteau Oceanis 41, with an SA/D of 18.05 and 74.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 2012 Beneteau Oceanis 41 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1984 Moody 33 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 21.6) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.75). The 2012 Beneteau Oceanis 41 has a comfort ratio of 16.0 and a capsize screening value of 0.78. The ballast ratios are 40.4% for the 1984 Moody 33 and 30.6% for the 2012 Beneteau Oceanis 41, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1984 Moody 33 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 140L of water capacity and 80L of fuel. The 2012 Beneteau Oceanis 41 offers 8 berths in 3 cabins with 250L water and 140L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1984 Moody 33 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2012 Beneteau Oceanis 41 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 2012 Beneteau Oceanis 41 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1984 Moody 33 · 2012 Beneteau Oceanis 41