1984 O'Day 30 vs 1983 Irwin 32 — Comparison

1984 O'Day 30
VS
1983 Irwin 32

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1984 O'Day 301983 Irwin 32
General
ManufacturerO'DayIrwin
Year1984–19891983–1988
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerC. Raymond HuntTed Irwin
Dimensions
LOA9.14 m (30.0 ft)9.75 m (32.0 ft)
LWL7.62 m (25.0 ft)8.08 m (26.5 ft)
Beam3.05 m (10.0 ft)3.20 m (10.5 ft)
Draft1.52 m (5.0 ft)1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement3,629 kg (8,001 lbs)4,990 kg (11,001 lbs)
Ballast1,452 kg (3,201 lbs)2,041 kg (4,500 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area36.0 m² (388 ft²)41.0 m² (441 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine13 HP18 HP
Fuel Capacity57 L (15.1 gal)68 L (18.0 gal)
Water Capacity76 L (20.1 gal)114 L (30.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths66
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1984 O'Day 30
15.49
1983 Irwin 32
14.27
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1984 O'Day 30
40.01
1983 Irwin 32
40.90
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1984 O'Day 30
0.79
1983 Irwin 32
0.75
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1984 O'Day 30
19.36
1983 Irwin 32
22.12

Detailed Comparison

The 1984 O'Day 30 and 1983 Irwin 32 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1984 O'Day 30 is a 1980s design by O'Day from USA, while the 1983 Irwin 32 is a 1980s offering from Irwin from USA. The 1984 O'Day 30 was penned by C. Raymond Hunt. The 1983 Irwin 32 was designed by Ted Irwin.

In terms of size, the 1984 O'Day 30 measures 9.14m (30.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.05m, compared to the 1983 Irwin 32 at 9.75m (32.0ft) with a 3.20m beam. The 1983 Irwin 32 is 0.61m longer than the 1984 O'Day 30. The 1983 Irwin 32 displaces approximately 38% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1984 O'Day 30 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.49 and 36.0 m² of sail area. The 1983 Irwin 32, with an SA/D of 14.27 and 41.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 1984 O'Day 30 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1984 O'Day 30 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 19.4) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.79). The 1983 Irwin 32 has a comfort ratio of 22.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 40.0% for the 1984 O'Day 30 and 40.9% for the 1983 Irwin 32, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1984 O'Day 30 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 76L of water capacity and 57L of fuel. The 1983 Irwin 32 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L water and 68L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1983 Irwin 32 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1984 O'Day 30 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1984 O'Day 30 · 1983 Irwin 32