1985 Sabre 38 vs Hunter 31 — Comparison

1985 Sabre 38
VS
Hunter 31Hunter 31

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1985 Sabre 38Hunter 31
General
ManufacturerSabreHunter
Year1985–19922000–2005
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerRoger HewsonGlenn Henderson
Dimensions
LOA11.58 m (38.0 ft)9.45 m (31.0 ft)
LWL9.14 m (30.0 ft)8.23 m (27.0 ft)
Beam3.56 m (11.7 ft)3.12 m (10.2 ft)
Draft1.68 m (5.5 ft)1.68 m (5.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement7,257 kg (15,999 lbs)4,082 kg (8,999 lbs)
Ballast3,175 kg (7,000 lbs)1,588 kg (3,501 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area61.2 m² (659 ft²)44.0 m² (474 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine35 HP18 HP
Fuel Capacity114 L (30.1 gal)57 L (15.1 gal)
Water Capacity189 L (49.9 gal)114 L (30.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths76
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1985 Sabre 38
16.59
Hunter 31
17.51
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1985 Sabre 38
43.75
Hunter 31
38.90
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1985 Sabre 38
0.74
Hunter 31
0.78
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1985 Sabre 38
21.08
Hunter 31
18.65

Detailed Comparison

The 1985 Sabre 38 and Hunter 31 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1985 Sabre 38 is a 1980s design by Sabre from USA, while the Hunter 31 is a 2000s offering from Hunter from USA. The 1985 Sabre 38 was penned by Roger Hewson. The Hunter 31 was designed by Glenn Henderson.

In terms of size, the 1985 Sabre 38 measures 11.58m (38.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.56m, compared to the Hunter 31 at 9.45m (31.0ft) with a 3.12m beam. The 1985 Sabre 38 is 2.13m longer than the Hunter 31. The 1985 Sabre 38 displaces approximately 78% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1985 Sabre 38 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.59 and 61.2 m² of sail area. The Hunter 31, with an SA/D of 17.51 and 44.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The Hunter 31 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1985 Sabre 38 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 21.1) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.74). The Hunter 31 has a comfort ratio of 18.7 and a capsize screening value of 0.78. The ballast ratios are 43.8% for the 1985 Sabre 38 and 38.9% for the Hunter 31, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1985 Sabre 38 provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 189L of water capacity and 114L of fuel. The Hunter 31 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L water and 57L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1985 Sabre 38 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hunter 31 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1985 Sabre 38 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1985 Sabre 38 · Hunter 31