1985 Westerly Storm 33 vs 2012 Beneteau Oceanis 41 — Comparison

1985 Westerly Storm 33
VS
2012 Beneteau Oceanis 412012 Beneteau Oceanis 41

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1985 Westerly Storm 332012 Beneteau Oceanis 41
General
ManufacturerWesterlyBeneteau
Year1985–19902012–2016
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUKFrance
DesignerEd DuboisFinot-Conq
Dimensions
LOA10.06 m (33.0 ft)12.43 m (40.8 ft)
LWL8.38 m (27.5 ft)10.89 m (35.7 ft)
Beam3.35 m (11.0 ft)3.99 m (13.1 ft)
Draft1.37 m (4.5 ft)2.10 m (6.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement5,216 kg (11,499 lbs)8,500 kg (18,739 lbs)
Ballast2,177 kg (4,799 lbs)2,600 kg (5,732 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area45.0 m² (484 ft²)74.0 m² (797 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeBilgeFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine22 HP40 HP
Fuel Capacity76 L (20.1 gal)140 L (37.0 gal)
Water Capacity114 L (30.1 gal)250 L (66.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths68
Cabins23

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1985 Westerly Storm 33
15.20
2012 Beneteau Oceanis 41
18.05
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1985 Westerly Storm 33
41.74
2012 Beneteau Oceanis 41
30.59
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1985 Westerly Storm 33
0.77
2012 Beneteau Oceanis 41
0.78
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1985 Westerly Storm 33
20.29
2012 Beneteau Oceanis 41
16.04

Detailed Comparison

The 1985 Westerly Storm 33 and 2012 Beneteau Oceanis 41 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1985 Westerly Storm 33 is a 1980s design by Westerly from UK, while the 2012 Beneteau Oceanis 41 is a modern offering from Beneteau from France. The 1985 Westerly Storm 33 was penned by Ed Dubois. The 2012 Beneteau Oceanis 41 was designed by Finot-Conq.

In terms of size, the 1985 Westerly Storm 33 measures 10.06m (33.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.35m, compared to the 2012 Beneteau Oceanis 41 at 12.43m (40.8ft) with a 3.99m beam. The 2012 Beneteau Oceanis 41 is 2.37m longer than the 1985 Westerly Storm 33. The 2012 Beneteau Oceanis 41 displaces approximately 63% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1985 Westerly Storm 33 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.20 and 45.0 m² of sail area. The 2012 Beneteau Oceanis 41, with an SA/D of 18.05 and 74.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 2012 Beneteau Oceanis 41 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1985 Westerly Storm 33 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 20.3) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.77). The 2012 Beneteau Oceanis 41 has a comfort ratio of 16.0 and a capsize screening value of 0.78. The ballast ratios are 41.7% for the 1985 Westerly Storm 33 and 30.6% for the 2012 Beneteau Oceanis 41, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1985 Westerly Storm 33 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L of water capacity and 76L of fuel. The 2012 Beneteau Oceanis 41 offers 8 berths in 3 cabins with 250L water and 140L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1985 Westerly Storm 33 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2012 Beneteau Oceanis 41 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 2012 Beneteau Oceanis 41 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1985 Westerly Storm 33 · 2012 Beneteau Oceanis 41