1986 Bavaria 32 vs Hunter 280 — Comparison

1986 Bavaria 321986 Bavaria 32
VS
Hunter 280Hunter 280

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1986 Bavaria 32Hunter 280
General
ManufacturerBavariaHunter
Year1986–19921998–2003
TypeSloopSloop
CountryGermanyUSA
DesignerDehler DesignGlenn Henderson
Dimensions
LOA9.75 m (32.0 ft)8.53 m (28.0 ft)
LWL8.38 m (27.5 ft)7.47 m (24.5 ft)
Beam3.28 m (10.8 ft)2.82 m (9.3 ft)
Draft1.70 m (5.6 ft)1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement4,900 kg (10,803 lbs)2,585 kg (5,699 lbs)
Ballast1,900 kg (4,189 lbs)998 kg (2,200 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area46.0 m² (495 ft²)34.0 m² (366 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine18 HP15 HP
Fuel Capacity75 L (19.8 gal)45 L (11.9 gal)
Water Capacity130 L (34.3 gal)76 L (20.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths65
Cabins21

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1986 Bavaria 32
16.20
Hunter 280
18.35
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1986 Bavaria 32
38.78
Hunter 280
38.61
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1986 Bavaria 32
0.77
Hunter 280
0.82
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1986 Bavaria 32
20.02
Hunter 280
16.46

Detailed Comparison

The 1986 Bavaria 32 and Hunter 280 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1986 Bavaria 32 is a 1980s design by Bavaria from Germany, while the Hunter 280 is a 1990s offering from Hunter from USA. The 1986 Bavaria 32 was penned by Dehler Design. The Hunter 280 was designed by Glenn Henderson.

In terms of size, the 1986 Bavaria 32 measures 9.75m (32.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.28m, compared to the Hunter 280 at 8.53m (28.0ft) with a 2.82m beam. The 1986 Bavaria 32 is 1.22m longer than the Hunter 280. The 1986 Bavaria 32 displaces approximately 90% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1986 Bavaria 32 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.20 and 46.0 m² of sail area. The Hunter 280, with an SA/D of 18.35 and 34.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The Hunter 280 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1986 Bavaria 32 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 20.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.77). The Hunter 280 has a comfort ratio of 16.5 and a capsize screening value of 0.82. The ballast ratios are 38.8% for the 1986 Bavaria 32 and 38.6% for the Hunter 280, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1986 Bavaria 32 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 130L of water capacity and 75L of fuel. The Hunter 280 offers 5 berths in 1 cabin with 76L water and 45L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1986 Bavaria 32 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hunter 280 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1986 Bavaria 32 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1986 Bavaria 32 · Hunter 280