1986 J/28 vs Hunter 260 — Comparison

1986 J/28
VS
Hunter 260Hunter 260

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1986 J/28Hunter 260
General
ManufacturerJ/BoatsHunter
Year1986–19901998–2004
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerRod JohnstoneGlenn Henderson
Dimensions
LOA8.66 m (28.4 ft)7.85 m (25.8 ft)
LWL7.32 m (24.0 ft)6.86 m (22.5 ft)
Beam3.05 m (10.0 ft)2.74 m (9.0 ft)
Draft1.68 m (5.5 ft)1.37 m (4.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement2,948 kg (6,499 lbs)2,041 kg (4,500 lbs)
Ballast1,361 kg (3,000 lbs)771 kg (1,700 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area37.6 m² (405 ft²)27.5 m² (296 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine12 HP10 HP
Fuel Capacity38 L (10.0 gal)38 L (10.0 gal)
Water Capacity57 L (15.1 gal)57 L (15.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths55
Cabins11

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1986 J/28
18.59
Hunter 260
17.37
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1986 J/28
46.17
Hunter 260
37.78
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1986 J/28
0.85
Hunter 260
0.87
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1986 J/28
17.20
Hunter 260
15.99

Detailed Comparison

The 1986 J/28 and Hunter 260 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1986 J/28 is a 1980s design by J/Boats from USA, while the Hunter 260 is a 1990s offering from Hunter from USA. The 1986 J/28 was penned by Rod Johnstone. The Hunter 260 was designed by Glenn Henderson.

In terms of size, the 1986 J/28 measures 8.66m (28.4ft) overall with a beam of 3.05m, compared to the Hunter 260 at 7.85m (25.8ft) with a 2.74m beam. The 1986 J/28 is 0.81m longer than the Hunter 260. The 1986 J/28 displaces approximately 44% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1986 J/28 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 18.59 and 37.6 m² of sail area. The Hunter 260, with an SA/D of 17.37 and 27.5 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 1986 J/28 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1986 J/28 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.2) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.85). The Hunter 260 has a comfort ratio of 16.0 and a capsize screening value of 0.87. The ballast ratios are 46.2% for the 1986 J/28 and 37.8% for the Hunter 260, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1986 J/28 provides 5 berths in 1 cabin with 57L of water capacity and 38L of fuel. The Hunter 260 offers 5 berths in 1 cabin with 57L water and 38L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1986 J/28 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1986 J/28 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1986 J/28 · Hunter 260