1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 vs 1988 Island Packet 32 — Comparison

1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25
VS
1988 Island Packet 32 1988 Island Packet 32

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 1988 Island Packet 32
General
Manufacturer Pacific Seacraft Island Packet
Year 1986–2007 1988–1997
Type Sloop Cutter
Country USA USA
Designer William Crealock Bob Johnson
Dimensions
LOA 7.62 m (25.0 ft) 9.75 m (32.0 ft)
LWL 5.94 m (19.5 ft) 8.38 m (27.5 ft)
Beam 2.44 m (8.0 ft) 3.35 m (11.0 ft)
Draft 1.07 m (3.5 ft) 1.22 m (4.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement 2,268 kg (5,000 lbs) 5,443 kg (12,000 lbs)
Ballast 953 kg (2,101 lbs) 2,268 kg (5,000 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 24.0 m² (258 ft²) 44.5 m² (479 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Full Full
Engine & Tanks
Engine 10 HP 25 HP
Fuel Capacity 30 L (7.9 gal) 114 L (30.1 gal)
Water Capacity 57 L (15.1 gal) 189 L (49.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 4 6
Cabins 1 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1986 Pacific Seacraft 25
14.13
1988 Island Packet 32
14.61
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1986 Pacific Seacraft 25
42.02
1988 Island Packet 32
41.67
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1986 Pacific Seacraft 25
0.74
1988 Island Packet 32
0.76
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1986 Pacific Seacraft 25
25.59
1988 Island Packet 32
21.63

Detailed Comparison

The 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 and 1988 Island Packet 32 represent different approaches to sailboat design. The 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 is a 1980s design by Pacific Seacraft from USA, while the 1988 Island Packet 32 is a 1980s offering from Island Packet from USA. The 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 was penned by William Crealock. The 1988 Island Packet 32 was designed by Bob Johnson.

In terms of size, the 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 measures 7.62m (25.0ft) overall with a beam of 2.44m, compared to the 1988 Island Packet 32 at 9.75m (32.0ft) with a 3.35m beam. The 1988 Island Packet 32 is 2.13m longer than the 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25. The 1988 Island Packet 32 displaces approximately 140% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 has modest sail power for its displacement with an SA/D ratio of 14.13 and 24.0 m² of sail area. The 1988 Island Packet 32, with an SA/D of 14.61 and 44.5 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 1988 Island Packet 32 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 25.6) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.74). The 1988 Island Packet 32 has a comfort ratio of 21.6 and a capsize screening value of 0.76. The ballast ratios are 42.0% for the 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 and 41.7% for the 1988 Island Packet 32, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 provides 4 berths in 1 cabin with 57L of water capacity and 30L of fuel. The 1988 Island Packet 32 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 189L water and 114L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1988 Island Packet 32 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1988 Island Packet 32 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS