1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 vs 1990 Island Packet 29 — Comparison

1986 Pacific Seacraft 25
VS
1990 Island Packet 291990 Island Packet 29

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1986 Pacific Seacraft 251990 Island Packet 29
General
ManufacturerPacific SeacraftIsland Packet
Year1986–20071990–1998
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerWilliam CrealockBob Johnson
Dimensions
LOA7.62 m (25.0 ft)8.84 m (29.0 ft)
LWL5.94 m (19.5 ft)7.47 m (24.5 ft)
Beam2.44 m (8.0 ft)3.05 m (10.0 ft)
Draft1.07 m (3.5 ft)1.12 m (3.7 ft)
Weight
Displacement2,268 kg (5,000 lbs)3,856 kg (8,501 lbs)
Ballast953 kg (2,101 lbs)1,588 kg (3,501 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area24.0 m² (258 ft²)33.5 m² (361 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFullFull
Engine & Tanks
Engine10 HP18 HP
Fuel Capacity30 L (7.9 gal)76 L (20.1 gal)
Water Capacity57 L (15.1 gal)132 L (34.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths45
Cabins11

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1986 Pacific Seacraft 25
14.13
1990 Island Packet 29
13.84
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1986 Pacific Seacraft 25
42.02
1990 Island Packet 29
41.18
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1986 Pacific Seacraft 25
0.74
1990 Island Packet 29
0.78
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1986 Pacific Seacraft 25
25.59
1990 Island Packet 29
21.60

Detailed Comparison

The 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 and 1990 Island Packet 29 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 is a 1980s design by Pacific Seacraft from USA, while the 1990 Island Packet 29 is a 1990s offering from Island Packet from USA. The 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 was penned by William Crealock. The 1990 Island Packet 29 was designed by Bob Johnson.

In terms of size, the 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 measures 7.62m (25.0ft) overall with a beam of 2.44m, compared to the 1990 Island Packet 29 at 8.84m (29.0ft) with a 3.05m beam. The 1990 Island Packet 29 is 1.22m longer than the 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25. The 1990 Island Packet 29 displaces approximately 70% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 has modest sail power for its displacement with an SA/D ratio of 14.13 and 24.0 m² of sail area. The 1990 Island Packet 29, with an SA/D of 13.84 and 33.5 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 25.6) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.74). The 1990 Island Packet 29 has a comfort ratio of 21.6 and a capsize screening value of 0.78. The ballast ratios are 42.0% for the 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 and 41.2% for the 1990 Island Packet 29, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 provides 4 berths in 1 cabin with 57L of water capacity and 30L of fuel. The 1990 Island Packet 29 offers 5 berths in 1 cabin with 132L water and 76L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1990 Island Packet 29 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 · 1990 Island Packet 29