1987 Cape Dory 40 vs 2013 Elan 350 — Comparison

1987 Cape Dory 40
VS
2013 Elan 350

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1987 Cape Dory 402013 Elan 350
General
ManufacturerCape DoryElan
Year1987–19922013–2018
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSASlovenia
DesignerCarl AlbergRob Humphreys
Dimensions
LOA12.19 m (40.0 ft)10.67 m (35.0 ft)
LWL9.45 m (31.0 ft)9.30 m (30.5 ft)
Beam3.66 m (12.0 ft)3.46 m (11.4 ft)
Draft1.68 m (5.5 ft)2.00 m (6.6 ft)
Weight
Displacement8,618 kg (18,999 lbs)6,100 kg (13,448 lbs)
Ballast3,629 kg (8,001 lbs)1,850 kg (4,079 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area64.5 m² (694 ft²)58.0 m² (624 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFullFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine40 HP21 HP
Fuel Capacity151 L (39.9 gal)80 L (21.1 gal)
Water Capacity284 L (75.0 gal)170 L (44.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths76
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1987 Cape Dory 40
15.59
2013 Elan 350
17.65
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1987 Cape Dory 40
42.11
2013 Elan 350
30.33
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1987 Cape Dory 40
0.72
2013 Elan 350
0.76
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1987 Cape Dory 40
22.29
2013 Elan 350
19.02

Detailed Comparison

The 1987 Cape Dory 40 and 2013 Elan 350 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1987 Cape Dory 40 is a 1980s design by Cape Dory from USA, while the 2013 Elan 350 is a modern offering from Elan from Slovenia. The 1987 Cape Dory 40 was penned by Carl Alberg. The 2013 Elan 350 was designed by Rob Humphreys.

In terms of size, the 1987 Cape Dory 40 measures 12.19m (40.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.66m, compared to the 2013 Elan 350 at 10.67m (35.0ft) with a 3.46m beam. The 1987 Cape Dory 40 is 1.52m longer than the 2013 Elan 350. The 1987 Cape Dory 40 displaces approximately 41% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1987 Cape Dory 40 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.59 and 64.5 m² of sail area. The 2013 Elan 350, with an SA/D of 17.65 and 58.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 2013 Elan 350 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1987 Cape Dory 40 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 22.3) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.72). The 2013 Elan 350 has a comfort ratio of 19.0 and a capsize screening value of 0.76. The ballast ratios are 42.1% for the 1987 Cape Dory 40 and 30.3% for the 2013 Elan 350, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1987 Cape Dory 40 provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 284L of water capacity and 151L of fuel. The 2013 Elan 350 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 170L water and 80L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1987 Cape Dory 40 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2013 Elan 350 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1987 Cape Dory 40 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1987 Cape Dory 40 · 2013 Elan 350