1988 C&C 32 vs 1979 Cal 39 — Comparison

1988 C&C 32
VS
1979 Cal 391979 Cal 39

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1988 C&C 321979 Cal 39
General
ManufacturerC&C YachtsCal
Year1988–19931979–1985
TypeSloopSloop
CountryCanadaUSA
DesignerCuthbertson & CassianBill Lapworth / C. Raymond Hunt
Dimensions
LOA9.75 m (32.0 ft)11.89 m (39.0 ft)
LWL8.23 m (27.0 ft)9.60 m (31.5 ft)
Beam3.28 m (10.8 ft)3.66 m (12.0 ft)
Draft1.83 m (6.0 ft)1.83 m (6.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement4,536 kg (10,000 lbs)8,165 kg (18,001 lbs)
Ballast1,996 kg (4,400 lbs)3,402 kg (7,500 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area45.8 m² (493 ft²)63.0 m² (678 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine18 HP30 HP
Fuel Capacity68 L (18.0 gal)114 L (30.1 gal)
Water Capacity114 L (30.1 gal)200 L (52.8 gal)
Accommodation
Berths67
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1988 C&C 32
16.98
1979 Cal 39
15.78
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1988 C&C 32
44.00
1979 Cal 39
41.67
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1988 C&C 32
0.79
1979 Cal 39
0.73
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1988 C&C 32
18.99
1979 Cal 39
21.05

Detailed Comparison

The 1988 C&C 32 and 1979 Cal 39 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1988 C&C 32 is a 1980s design by C&C Yachts from Canada, while the 1979 Cal 39 is a 1970s offering from Cal from USA. The 1988 C&C 32 was penned by Cuthbertson & Cassian. The 1979 Cal 39 was designed by Bill Lapworth / C. Raymond Hunt.

In terms of size, the 1988 C&C 32 measures 9.75m (32.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.28m, compared to the 1979 Cal 39 at 11.89m (39.0ft) with a 3.66m beam. The 1979 Cal 39 is 2.14m longer than the 1988 C&C 32. The 1979 Cal 39 displaces approximately 80% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1988 C&C 32 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.98 and 45.8 m² of sail area. The 1979 Cal 39, with an SA/D of 15.78 and 63.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1988 C&C 32 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1988 C&C 32 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 19.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.79). The 1979 Cal 39 has a comfort ratio of 21.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.73. The ballast ratios are 44.0% for the 1988 C&C 32 and 41.7% for the 1979 Cal 39, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1988 C&C 32 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L of water capacity and 68L of fuel. The 1979 Cal 39 offers 7 berths in 2 cabins with 200L water and 114L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1979 Cal 39 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1988 C&C 32 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1979 Cal 39 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1988 C&C 32 · 1979 Cal 39