1988 C&C 32 vs Catalina 323 — Comparison

1988 C&C 32
VS
Catalina 323

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1988 C&C 32Catalina 323
General
ManufacturerC&C YachtsCatalina
Year1988–19932004–2009
TypeSloopSloop
CountryCanadaUSA
DesignerCuthbertson & CassianGerry Douglas
Dimensions
LOA9.75 m (32.0 ft)9.75 m (32.0 ft)
LWL8.23 m (27.0 ft)8.84 m (29.0 ft)
Beam3.28 m (10.8 ft)3.25 m (10.7 ft)
Draft1.83 m (6.0 ft)1.75 m (5.7 ft)
Weight
Displacement4,536 kg (10,000 lbs)4,763 kg (10,501 lbs)
Ballast1,996 kg (4,400 lbs)1,814 kg (3,999 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area45.8 m² (493 ft²)46.0 m² (495 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine18 HP21 HP
Fuel Capacity68 L (18.0 gal)76 L (20.1 gal)
Water Capacity114 L (30.1 gal)151 L (39.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths66
Cabins21

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1988 C&C 32
16.98
Catalina 323
16.51
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1988 C&C 32
44.00
Catalina 323
38.09
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1988 C&C 32
0.79
Catalina 323
0.77
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1988 C&C 32
18.99
Catalina 323
18.34

Detailed Comparison

The 1988 C&C 32 and Catalina 323 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1988 C&C 32 is a 1980s design by C&C Yachts from Canada, while the Catalina 323 is a 2000s offering from Catalina from USA. The 1988 C&C 32 was penned by Cuthbertson & Cassian. The Catalina 323 was designed by Gerry Douglas.

In terms of size, the 1988 C&C 32 measures 9.75m (32.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.28m, compared to the Catalina 323 at 9.75m (32.0ft) with a 3.25m beam. The Catalina 323 displaces approximately 5% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1988 C&C 32 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.98 and 45.8 m² of sail area. The Catalina 323, with an SA/D of 16.51 and 46.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1988 C&C 32 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1988 C&C 32 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 19.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.79). The Catalina 323 has a comfort ratio of 18.3 and a capsize screening value of 0.77. The ballast ratios are 44.0% for the 1988 C&C 32 and 38.1% for the Catalina 323, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1988 C&C 32 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L of water capacity and 68L of fuel. The Catalina 323 offers 6 berths in 1 cabin with 151L water and 76L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1988 C&C 32 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1988 C&C 32 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1988 C&C 32 · Catalina 323