1988 C&C 32 vs 2004 Najad 405 — Comparison

1988 C&C 32
VS
2004 Najad 405

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1988 C&C 322004 Najad 405
General
ManufacturerC&C YachtsNajad
Year1988–19932004–2012
TypeSloopSloop
CountryCanadaSweden
DesignerCuthbertson & CassianJudel/Vrolijk
Dimensions
LOA9.75 m (32.0 ft)12.40 m (40.7 ft)
LWL8.23 m (27.0 ft)10.40 m (34.1 ft)
Beam3.28 m (10.8 ft)3.82 m (12.5 ft)
Draft1.83 m (6.0 ft)2.00 m (6.6 ft)
Weight
Displacement4,536 kg (10,000 lbs)9,200 kg (20,283 lbs)
Ballast1,996 kg (4,400 lbs)3,600 kg (7,937 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area45.8 m² (493 ft²)73.0 m² (786 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine18 HP55 HP
Fuel Capacity68 L (18.0 gal)200 L (52.8 gal)
Water Capacity114 L (30.1 gal)350 L (92.5 gal)
Accommodation
Berths67
Cabins23

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1988 C&C 32
16.98
2004 Najad 405
16.89
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1988 C&C 32
44.00
2004 Najad 405
39.13
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1988 C&C 32
0.79
2004 Najad 405
0.73
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1988 C&C 32
18.99
2004 Najad 405
19.60

Detailed Comparison

The 1988 C&C 32 and 2004 Najad 405 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1988 C&C 32 is a 1980s design by C&C Yachts from Canada, while the 2004 Najad 405 is a 2000s offering from Najad from Sweden. The 1988 C&C 32 was penned by Cuthbertson & Cassian. The 2004 Najad 405 was designed by Judel/Vrolijk.

In terms of size, the 1988 C&C 32 measures 9.75m (32.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.28m, compared to the 2004 Najad 405 at 12.40m (40.7ft) with a 3.82m beam. The 2004 Najad 405 is 2.65m longer than the 1988 C&C 32. The 2004 Najad 405 displaces approximately 103% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1988 C&C 32 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.98 and 45.8 m² of sail area. The 2004 Najad 405, with an SA/D of 16.89 and 73.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1988 C&C 32 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1988 C&C 32 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 19.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.79). The 2004 Najad 405 has a comfort ratio of 19.6 and a capsize screening value of 0.73. The ballast ratios are 44.0% for the 1988 C&C 32 and 39.1% for the 2004 Najad 405, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1988 C&C 32 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L of water capacity and 68L of fuel. The 2004 Najad 405 offers 7 berths in 3 cabins with 350L water and 200L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 2004 Najad 405 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1988 C&C 32 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 2004 Najad 405 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1988 C&C 32 · 2004 Najad 405