1988 C&C 32 vs Hanse 315 — Comparison

1988 C&C 32
VS
Hanse 315

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1988 C&C 32Hanse 315
General
ManufacturerC&C YachtsHanse
Year1988–19932010–2016
TypeSloopSloop
CountryCanadaGermany
DesignerCuthbertson & Cassianjudel/vrolijk & co
Dimensions
LOA9.75 m (32.0 ft)9.65 m (31.7 ft)
LWL8.23 m (27.0 ft)8.55 m (28.1 ft)
Beam3.28 m (10.8 ft)3.15 m (10.3 ft)
Draft1.83 m (6.0 ft)1.65 m (5.4 ft)
Weight
Displacement4,536 kg (10,000 lbs)4,200 kg (9,259 lbs)
Ballast1,996 kg (4,400 lbs)1,200 kg (2,646 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area45.8 m² (493 ft²)41.5 m² (447 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine18 HP15 HP
Fuel Capacity68 L (18.0 gal)85 L (22.5 gal)
Water Capacity114 L (30.1 gal)120 L (31.7 gal)
Accommodation
Berths64
Cabins21

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1988 C&C 32
16.98
Hanse 315
16.20
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1988 C&C 32
44.00
Hanse 315
28.57
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1988 C&C 32
0.79
Hanse 315
0.78
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1988 C&C 32
18.99
Hanse 315
17.75

Detailed Comparison

The 1988 C&C 32 and Hanse 315 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1988 C&C 32 is a 1980s design by C&C Yachts from Canada, while the Hanse 315 is a modern offering from Hanse from Germany. The 1988 C&C 32 was penned by Cuthbertson & Cassian. The Hanse 315 was designed by judel/vrolijk & co.

In terms of size, the 1988 C&C 32 measures 9.75m (32.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.28m, compared to the Hanse 315 at 9.65m (31.7ft) with a 3.15m beam. The 1988 C&C 32 is 0.10m longer than the Hanse 315. The 1988 C&C 32 displaces approximately 8% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1988 C&C 32 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.98 and 45.8 m² of sail area. The Hanse 315, with an SA/D of 16.20 and 41.5 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1988 C&C 32 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1988 C&C 32 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 19.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.79). The Hanse 315 has a comfort ratio of 17.8 and a capsize screening value of 0.78. The ballast ratios are 44.0% for the 1988 C&C 32 and 28.6% for the Hanse 315, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1988 C&C 32 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L of water capacity and 68L of fuel. The Hanse 315 offers 4 berths in 1 cabin with 120L water and 85L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1988 C&C 32 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1988 C&C 32 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1988 C&C 32 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1988 C&C 32 · Hanse 315