1988 Contest 38 vs 1987 Cape Dory 40 — Comparison

1988 Contest 381988 Contest 38
VS
1987 Cape Dory 40

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1988 Contest 381987 Cape Dory 40
General
ManufacturerContestCape Dory
Year1988–19961987–1992
TypeSloopSloop
CountryNetherlandsUSA
DesignerDick ZaalCarl Alberg
Dimensions
LOA11.55 m (37.9 ft)12.19 m (40.0 ft)
LWL9.14 m (30.0 ft)9.45 m (31.0 ft)
Beam3.47 m (11.4 ft)3.66 m (12.0 ft)
Draft1.83 m (6.0 ft)1.68 m (5.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement7,711 kg (17,000 lbs)8,618 kg (18,999 lbs)
Ballast3,175 kg (7,000 lbs)3,629 kg (8,001 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area61.5 m² (662 ft²)64.5 m² (694 ft²)
Hull MaterialSteelFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFull
Engine & Tanks
Engine35 HP40 HP
Fuel Capacity200 L (52.8 gal)151 L (39.9 gal)
Water Capacity300 L (79.3 gal)284 L (75.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths67
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1988 Contest 38
16.01
1987 Cape Dory 40
15.59
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1988 Contest 38
41.17
1987 Cape Dory 40
42.11
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1988 Contest 38
0.70
1987 Cape Dory 40
0.72
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1988 Contest 38
23.22
1987 Cape Dory 40
22.29

Detailed Comparison

The 1988 Contest 38 and 1987 Cape Dory 40 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1988 Contest 38 is a 1980s design by Contest from Netherlands, while the 1987 Cape Dory 40 is a 1980s offering from Cape Dory from USA. The 1988 Contest 38 was penned by Dick Zaal. The 1987 Cape Dory 40 was designed by Carl Alberg.

In terms of size, the 1988 Contest 38 measures 11.55m (37.9ft) overall with a beam of 3.47m, compared to the 1987 Cape Dory 40 at 12.19m (40.0ft) with a 3.66m beam. The 1987 Cape Dory 40 is 0.64m longer than the 1988 Contest 38. The 1987 Cape Dory 40 displaces approximately 12% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1988 Contest 38 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.01 and 61.5 m² of sail area. The 1987 Cape Dory 40, with an SA/D of 15.59 and 64.5 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1988 Contest 38 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1988 Contest 38 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 23.2) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.70). The 1987 Cape Dory 40 has a comfort ratio of 22.3 and a capsize screening value of 0.72. The ballast ratios are 41.2% for the 1988 Contest 38 and 42.1% for the 1987 Cape Dory 40, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1988 Contest 38 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 300L of water capacity and 200L of fuel. The 1987 Cape Dory 40 offers 7 berths in 2 cabins with 284L water and 151L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1988 Contest 38 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1988 Contest 38 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1987 Cape Dory 40 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1988 Contest 38 · 1987 Cape Dory 40