1988 Contest 38 vs 1990 Sabre 36 — Comparison

1988 Contest 38 1988 Contest 38
VS
1990 Sabre 36 1990 Sabre 36

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1988 Contest 38 1990 Sabre 36
General
Manufacturer Contest Sabre
Year 1988–1996 1990–1998
Type Sloop Sloop
Country Netherlands USA
Designer Dick Zaal Roger Hewson
Dimensions
LOA 11.55 m (37.9 ft) 10.97 m (36.0 ft)
LWL 9.14 m (30.0 ft) 9.14 m (30.0 ft)
Beam 3.47 m (11.4 ft) 3.35 m (11.0 ft)
Draft 1.83 m (6.0 ft) 1.60 m (5.2 ft)
Weight
Displacement 7,711 kg (17,000 lbs) 5,897 kg (13,001 lbs)
Ballast 3,175 kg (7,000 lbs) 2,449 kg (5,399 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 61.5 m² (662 ft²) 52.5 m² (565 ft²)
Hull Material Steel Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 35 HP 28 HP
Fuel Capacity 200 L (52.8 gal) 76 L (20.1 gal)
Water Capacity 300 L (79.3 gal) 151 L (39.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 6 6
Cabins 2 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1988 Contest 38
16.01
1990 Sabre 36
16.34
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1988 Contest 38
41.17
1990 Sabre 36
41.53
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1988 Contest 38
0.70
1990 Sabre 36
0.74
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1988 Contest 38
23.22
1990 Sabre 36
19.29

Detailed Comparison

The 1988 Contest 38 and 1990 Sabre 36 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1988 Contest 38 is a 1980s design by Contest from Netherlands, while the 1990 Sabre 36 is a 1990s offering from Sabre from USA. The 1988 Contest 38 was penned by Dick Zaal. The 1990 Sabre 36 was designed by Roger Hewson.

In terms of size, the 1988 Contest 38 measures 11.55m (37.9ft) overall with a beam of 3.47m, compared to the 1990 Sabre 36 at 10.97m (36.0ft) with a 3.35m beam. The 1988 Contest 38 is 0.58m longer than the 1990 Sabre 36. The 1988 Contest 38 displaces approximately 31% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1988 Contest 38 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.01 and 61.5 m² of sail area. The 1990 Sabre 36, with an SA/D of 16.34 and 52.5 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1990 Sabre 36 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1988 Contest 38 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 23.2) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.70). The 1990 Sabre 36 has a comfort ratio of 19.3 and a capsize screening value of 0.74. The ballast ratios are 41.2% for the 1988 Contest 38 and 41.5% for the 1990 Sabre 36, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1988 Contest 38 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 300L of water capacity and 200L of fuel. The 1990 Sabre 36 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 151L water and 76L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1988 Contest 38 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1990 Sabre 36 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS