1988 Contest 38 vs Hanse 470 — Comparison

1988 Contest 381988 Contest 38
VS
Hanse 470

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1988 Contest 38Hanse 470
General
ManufacturerContestHanse
Year1988–19962013–2017
TypeSloopSloop
CountryNetherlandsGermany
DesignerDick Zaaljudel/vrolijk & co
Dimensions
LOA11.55 m (37.9 ft)14.45 m (47.4 ft)
LWL9.14 m (30.0 ft)12.85 m (42.2 ft)
Beam3.47 m (11.4 ft)4.42 m (14.5 ft)
Draft1.83 m (6.0 ft)2.25 m (7.4 ft)
Weight
Displacement7,711 kg (17,000 lbs)11,800 kg (26,015 lbs)
Ballast3,175 kg (7,000 lbs)3,700 kg (8,157 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area61.5 m² (662 ft²)96.0 m² (1,033 ft²)
Hull MaterialSteelFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine35 HP75 HP
Fuel Capacity200 L (52.8 gal)250 L (66.0 gal)
Water Capacity300 L (79.3 gal)430 L (113.6 gal)
Accommodation
Berths610
Cabins23

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1988 Contest 38
16.01
Hanse 470
18.81
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1988 Contest 38
41.17
Hanse 470
31.36
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1988 Contest 38
0.70
Hanse 470
0.78
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1988 Contest 38
23.22
Hanse 470
14.09

Detailed Comparison

The 1988 Contest 38 and Hanse 470 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1988 Contest 38 is a 1980s design by Contest from Netherlands, while the Hanse 470 is a modern offering from Hanse from Germany. The 1988 Contest 38 was penned by Dick Zaal. The Hanse 470 was designed by judel/vrolijk & co.

In terms of size, the 1988 Contest 38 measures 11.55m (37.9ft) overall with a beam of 3.47m, compared to the Hanse 470 at 14.45m (47.4ft) with a 4.42m beam. The Hanse 470 is 2.90m longer than the 1988 Contest 38. The Hanse 470 displaces approximately 53% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1988 Contest 38 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.01 and 61.5 m² of sail area. The Hanse 470, with an SA/D of 18.81 and 96.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The Hanse 470 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1988 Contest 38 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 23.2) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.70). The Hanse 470 has a comfort ratio of 14.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.78. The ballast ratios are 41.2% for the 1988 Contest 38 and 31.4% for the Hanse 470, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1988 Contest 38 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 300L of water capacity and 200L of fuel. The Hanse 470 offers 10 berths in 3 cabins with 430L water and 250L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1988 Contest 38 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hanse 470 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The Hanse 470 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1988 Contest 38 · Hanse 470