1988 Contest 44CS vs 2007 Moody 46 — Comparison

1988 Contest 44CS 1988 Contest 44CS
VS
2007 Moody 46 2007 Moody 46

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1988 Contest 44CS 2007 Moody 46
General
Manufacturer Contest Moody
Year 1988–1996 2007–2014
Type Sloop Sloop
Country Netherlands Germany
Designer Dick Zaal Bill Dixon
Dimensions
LOA 13.41 m (44.0 ft) 13.95 m (45.8 ft)
LWL 10.67 m (35.0 ft) 12.30 m (40.4 ft)
Beam 3.96 m (13.0 ft) 4.49 m (14.7 ft)
Draft 2.00 m (6.6 ft) 1.89 m (6.2 ft)
Weight
Displacement 12,700 kg (27,999 lbs) 14,500 kg (31,967 lbs)
Ballast 5,200 kg (11,464 lbs) 5,200 kg (11,464 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 85.0 m² (915 ft²) 96.0 m² (1,033 ft²)
Hull Material Steel Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 75 HP 75 HP
Fuel Capacity 300 L (79.3 gal) 300 L (79.3 gal)
Water Capacity 500 L (132.1 gal) 500 L (132.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 7 8
Cabins 3 3

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1988 Contest 44CS
15.86
2007 Moody 46
16.40
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1988 Contest 44CS
40.94
2007 Moody 46
35.86
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1988 Contest 44CS
0.68
2007 Moody 46
0.74
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1988 Contest 44CS
23.62
2007 Moody 46
18.40

Detailed Comparison

The 1988 Contest 44CS and 2007 Moody 46 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1988 Contest 44CS is a 1980s design by Contest from Netherlands, while the 2007 Moody 46 is a 2000s offering from Moody from Germany. The 1988 Contest 44CS was penned by Dick Zaal. The 2007 Moody 46 was designed by Bill Dixon.

In terms of size, the 1988 Contest 44CS measures 13.41m (44.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.96m, compared to the 2007 Moody 46 at 13.95m (45.8ft) with a 4.49m beam. The 2007 Moody 46 is 0.54m longer than the 1988 Contest 44CS. The 2007 Moody 46 displaces approximately 14% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1988 Contest 44CS has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.86 and 85.0 m² of sail area. The 2007 Moody 46, with an SA/D of 16.40 and 96.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 2007 Moody 46 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1988 Contest 44CS offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 23.6) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.68). The 2007 Moody 46 has a comfort ratio of 18.4 and a capsize screening value of 0.74. The ballast ratios are 40.9% for the 1988 Contest 44CS and 35.9% for the 2007 Moody 46, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1988 Contest 44CS provides 7 berths in 3 cabins with 500L of water capacity and 300L of fuel. The 2007 Moody 46 offers 8 berths in 3 cabins with 500L water and 300L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1988 Contest 44CS is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2007 Moody 46 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 2007 Moody 46 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS