Hunter 33 vs 1984 Moody 33 — Comparison

Hunter 33Hunter 33
VS
1984 Moody 331984 Moody 33

Specifications Side by Side

SpecificationHunter 331984 Moody 33
General
ManufacturerHunterMoody
Year1988–19941984–1990
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUK
DesignerHunter Design TeamBill Dixon
Dimensions
LOA10.06 m (33.0 ft)10.06 m (33.0 ft)
LWL8.53 m (28.0 ft)8.23 m (27.0 ft)
Beam3.35 m (11.0 ft)3.25 m (10.7 ft)
Draft1.68 m (5.5 ft)1.40 m (4.6 ft)
Weight
Displacement4,763 kg (10,501 lbs)5,200 kg (11,464 lbs)
Ballast1,814 kg (3,999 lbs)2,100 kg (4,630 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area48.0 m² (517 ft²)44.0 m² (474 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine21 HP20 HP
Fuel Capacity76 L (20.1 gal)80 L (21.1 gal)
Water Capacity151 L (39.9 gal)140 L (37.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths66
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Hunter 33
17.23
1984 Moody 33
14.90
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Hunter 33
38.09
1984 Moody 33
40.38
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Hunter 33
0.80
1984 Moody 33
0.75
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Hunter 33
18.10
1984 Moody 33
21.57

Detailed Comparison

The Hunter 33 and 1984 Moody 33 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Hunter 33 is a 1980s design by Hunter from USA, while the 1984 Moody 33 is a 1980s offering from Moody from UK. The Hunter 33 was penned by Hunter Design Team. The 1984 Moody 33 was designed by Bill Dixon.

In terms of size, the Hunter 33 measures 10.06m (33.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.35m, compared to the 1984 Moody 33 at 10.06m (33.0ft) with a 3.25m beam. The 1984 Moody 33 displaces approximately 9% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Hunter 33 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.23 and 48.0 m² of sail area. The 1984 Moody 33, with an SA/D of 14.90 and 44.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The Hunter 33 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Hunter 33 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 18.1) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.80). The 1984 Moody 33 has a comfort ratio of 21.6 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 38.1% for the Hunter 33 and 40.4% for the 1984 Moody 33, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Hunter 33 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 151L of water capacity and 76L of fuel. The 1984 Moody 33 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 140L water and 80L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1984 Moody 33 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hunter 33 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: Hunter 33 · 1984 Moody 33