Hunter 33 vs 1985 Contest 36 — Comparison

Hunter 33Hunter 33
VS
1985 Contest 361985 Contest 36

Specifications Side by Side

SpecificationHunter 331985 Contest 36
General
ManufacturerHunterContest
Year1988–19941985–1995
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSANetherlands
DesignerHunter Design TeamDick Zaal
Dimensions
LOA10.06 m (33.0 ft)10.97 m (36.0 ft)
LWL8.53 m (28.0 ft)8.84 m (29.0 ft)
Beam3.35 m (11.0 ft)3.40 m (11.2 ft)
Draft1.68 m (5.5 ft)1.75 m (5.7 ft)
Weight
Displacement4,763 kg (10,501 lbs)6,500 kg (14,330 lbs)
Ballast1,814 kg (3,999 lbs)2,700 kg (5,952 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area48.0 m² (517 ft²)54.0 m² (581 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassSteel
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine21 HP28 HP
Fuel Capacity76 L (20.1 gal)150 L (39.6 gal)
Water Capacity151 L (39.9 gal)250 L (66.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths66
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Hunter 33
17.23
1985 Contest 36
15.75
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Hunter 33
38.09
1985 Contest 36
41.54
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Hunter 33
0.80
1985 Contest 36
0.73
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Hunter 33
18.10
1985 Contest 36
21.78

Detailed Comparison

The Hunter 33 and 1985 Contest 36 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Hunter 33 is a 1980s design by Hunter from USA, while the 1985 Contest 36 is a 1980s offering from Contest from Netherlands. The Hunter 33 was penned by Hunter Design Team. The 1985 Contest 36 was designed by Dick Zaal.

In terms of size, the Hunter 33 measures 10.06m (33.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.35m, compared to the 1985 Contest 36 at 10.97m (36.0ft) with a 3.40m beam. The 1985 Contest 36 is 0.91m longer than the Hunter 33. The 1985 Contest 36 displaces approximately 36% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Hunter 33 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.23 and 48.0 m² of sail area. The 1985 Contest 36, with an SA/D of 15.75 and 54.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The Hunter 33 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Hunter 33 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 18.1) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.80). The 1985 Contest 36 has a comfort ratio of 21.8 and a capsize screening value of 0.73. The ballast ratios are 38.1% for the Hunter 33 and 41.5% for the 1985 Contest 36, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Hunter 33 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 151L of water capacity and 76L of fuel. The 1985 Contest 36 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 250L water and 150L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1985 Contest 36 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hunter 33 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: Hunter 33 · 1985 Contest 36